Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?

Open to Debate | Jun 9, 2023
Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.  In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?  Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett   Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby  Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Top Stories

Throngs of Knicks fans surge into Lower Manhattan to witness historic parade

How an alleged NYC real estate scammer stayed in business despite years of complaints

What Are Ultra-Processed Foods and What Are They Doing to Us?

How to be a Good New York City Tour Guide

YOU ARE ONLINE