On Monday morning, I wrote that allegations the NSA had intercepted French phone calls weren't actually very important. My logic was that allies spy on each other routinely. When they get caught, there’s a lot of ceremonial outrage and apology that amounts to very little.
At a certain point, if the US is brazen or unlucky enough to consistently get caught spying on our allies, maybe there are consequences.
Separately, this week the European Parliament voted to stop sharing Europeans’ personal financial data with US corporations. From the Guardian:
US companies providing data services in Europe but not based there would need to obtain special permission before they could transfer information to, and store it in, the US, where it may be tapped by the NSA. They would face swingeing fines if found to be in breach.
To be clear, the vote isn’t binding. It’ll serve as a framework for continuing negotiations. However, each time a paper reports on these continued negotiations, they seem to mention the latest US spying blunder. The Guardian’s report pivots from the data negotiations to the story of US spying on French communications. The BBC pivots instead to the story of the US spying on Germany.
At a certain point, you have to wonder how much the US’s ability to gather data overseas will be impeded by the fact that we make it so difficult for our allies to pretend to trust us in public.