Senator Jacob K. Javits

Wednesday, January 22, 1964

This episode is from the WNYC archives. It may contain language which is no longer politically or socially appropriate.

New York Senator Jacob K. Javits discusses foreign policy needs, particularly as they relate to Latin America. He talks about the political upheavals in recent years. He makes several suggestions for the US Latin American policies.

1) The US is spreading foreign aid over too many nations. The limited resources should be directed to certain countries that are nearest to the "take off point" and have a strategic significance to the success of the alliance and in terms of the security of the hemisphere. These nations could become "centers of strength" in Latin America. The prime example he gives is Mexico.

2) Incorporate private enterprise into foreign aid.

Questions and answers follow.

When asked about the continued non-recognition of communist China Javits responds with a strongly worded statement laying out his views. Sees no benefit in recognizing the communist nation, he government of the country as full of hate toward the United States and the United Nations. He states that they are in defiance of mankind.

Audio courtesy of the NYC Municipal Archives WNYC Collection

WNYC archives id: 70556
Municipal archives id: T242


Jacob K. Javits


More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.


About Overseas Press Club

Broadcast in cooperation with CUNY, this 1942 wartime radio show features members of faculty discussing different aspects of Americanism, the war effort, and the threat of un-democratic ideas.


Supported by