Streams

Proposal to Raise Gas Tax Has Allies Outside Congress

Thursday, December 05, 2013 - 07:32 AM

WAMU

The federal gasoline tax, last raised in 1993 to 18 cents per gallon, would increase five cents per year over three years and have future increases tied to inflation, under legislation proposed Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR). With the Highway Trust Fund set to go broke in ten months, the congressman called on leaders of both parties and the Obama administration to raise the tax to replenish the pot of money that pays for rail and road improvements.

“What I am proposing is that we have an adult conversation about how we deal with the pending crisis that is less than 10 months away,” said Rep. Blumenauer. “I’ve been in Congress 17 years working on this issue and there is never a good time. The failure has been bipartisan in nature.”

The politics seem to be working against Blumenauer’s proposal again. The Republican-led House seems unlikely to support any tax increase, and President Obama has opposed hiking the fuel tax. The U.S. Department of Transportation, whose new secretary Anthony Foxx has echoed the administration’s line, did not respond to a request for comment.

“Nobody, the administration, no Republican or Democratic leaders in Congress, have come forward,” said Blumenauer.

The current tax of 18 cents a gallon has lost considerable value against inflation, higher fuel efficiency standards, and fewer vehicle miles traveled. The fact that Americans are driving less and fuel efficiency will continue to improve makes the gasoline tax an unsustainable funding source, but does not mean Congress should fail to raise it now, Blumenauer said.

“I hope this is the last gas tax increase that Congress ever has to pass,” he said. “I think we need to change the system. Oregon gave you the first gas tax dedicated to highway construction 94 years ago, and it’s been experimenting for the past 10 years with an approach that would be based on vehicle miles traveled.”

In 2001 the Oregon State Legislature created a task force to study the implementation of a “road usage charge,” commonly called a VMT, or vehicle miles traveled, tax. A recent Oregon Senate bill will allow the state’s transportation department to sign up 5,000 volunteer drivers for a mileage collection system in 2015.

Meantime, supporters of a higher gas tax hope to include Blumenauer’s proposal within a larger deficit reduction plan to smooth the way for reluctant members of Congress to vote for a tax increase. The Oregon lawmaker has allies, including groups who would directly benefit from the road construction spurred by a replenished highway trust fund: labor unions, contractors, and engineers. But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is also supporting the proposed gas tax increase.

“We believe that Rep. Blumenauer has chosen the right path. The introduction of his legislation will generate constructive conversation. The Chamber continues to support—as it has for many years—increases in user fees to support federal investment in highways, highway safety, and public transportation” said a posting on the Chamber’s blog.

Whether these groups can convince the leaders of both parties and the administration remains to be seen.

“It has a better chance now than at any time in the past decade primarily because you’ve got a president who is in the last few years of his term, who has the ability to escape the political damage that could come from a gas tax increase,” said Joshua Schank, the president of the Washington-based Eno Center for Transportation, a policy and research group.

While Schank supports increasing the gas tax now and tying future increases to inflation, he does not view the tax as a sustainable funding source. Moreover, a replenished highway trust fund would not necessarily lead to better funding choices on a national level because members of Congress compete for those dollars to fund projects in their own districts, he said.

“It's not a strategic investment method. Most other nations [Western Europe, Japan, Canada] have gas taxes that are actually much higher than ours, but they don't dedicate that money to transportation,” Schank said. “Instead they use general fund revenues to fund their transportation investments, and as a result they tend to make better decisions about transportation investment.”

In recent years $50 billion have been transferred from the general fund budget to the trust fund because the latter keeps running out of money, worsening the U.S. budget deficit.

Tags:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [1]

David Goldberg from Washington, DC

A well-done, savvy write-up, Martin. I wish more people understood the situation we're in. When Congress passed the last transportation bill, MAP-21, they knew they were headed for funding trouble, but authorized states to keep spending at the same levels as in recent years. Why? Because to slash the investment in transportation would be devastating to the economy, now and long into the future. So states have gone along obligating funds for fixing, replacing and building roads, bridges and transit with the expectation the feds will reimburse them for their part of the project. But as it stands now the trust fund to reimburse them will be empty come next fiscal year, meaning another huge transfer from the general fund, or a halt to projects critical to getting people to work and goods to market. Blumenauer is right that something needs to be done, soon, and it probably won't be politically popular, unless a whole lot more trusted individuals speak up to make the case for investment. That's why we at Transportation for America are rallying local elected, business and civic leaders from around the country to a realistic proposal to raise and invest additional revenue. (See it here:
http://t4america.org/our-vision/investment/) We think this plan is one Americans can rally around, if our leaders will trust them enough to explain the situation to them, as well as the very real payoff in investing wisely in our future. Happy to talk more about this, Martin.

Dec. 10 2013 10:39 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored