Obama: U.S. Sending Military Advisers to Iraq

Thursday, June 19, 2014

US President Barack Obama attends a trilateral meeting with the Japanese prime minister and the South Korean president (both not seen) at the US ambassador's residence in The Hague on March 25, 2014. (SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty)

Edging back into a military role in Iraq, President Barack Obama on Thursday said he was dispatching up to 300 military advisers to help quell the rising insurgency in the crumbling state. He called on Iraqi leaders to govern with a more "inclusive agenda" to ensure the country does not descend into civil war.

Though not specifically mentioning airstrikes, an option the U.S. has been considering, Obama said he was leaving open the possibility of "targeted" military action in the future. He said the U.S. also would increase its intelligence efforts in Iraq and was creating joint operations centers with Iraqis.

When coupled with previously announced steps, Obama's actions could put about 600 additional U.S. troops back on the ground in Iraq. The 300 military advisers he announced Thursday would join up to 275 being positioned in and around Iraq to provide security and support for the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and other American interests.

But he was adamant that U.S. troops would not be returning to combat.

"We do not have the ability to simply solve this problem by sending in tens of thousands of troops and committing the kinds of blood and treasure that has already been expended in Iraq," Obama told reporters in the White House briefing room. "Ultimately, this is something that is going to have to be solved by Iraqis."

Sketching a dire situation, Obama called this a moment when "the state of Iraq hangs in the balance" and cautioned that "there's not going to be a simple military solution."

He stopped short of calling for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to resign, saying "it's not our job to choose Iraq's leaders." But he said those leaders "must rise above their differences and come together" for the sake of their nation.

"Let's not plunge this back into the abyss," he said.

Obama spoke after meeting with his national security team to discuss military options and consider how strongly to press al-Maliki to undertake changes and make his government more inclusive. Top U.S. officials believe that giving more credence to Sunni concerns about al-Maliki may offer the best opportunity to stave off another deadly round of sectarian fighting of the kind that engulfed Iraq less than a decade ago.

U.S. officials have been concerned that pushing al-Maliki too hard might stiffen his resolve to stay in office and drive him closer to Iran, which is seeking to keep the Shiite leader in power. However the administration does want to see evidence of a leadership transition plan being put in place in Iraq.

Speaking in advance of the president's announcement, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi voiced concern about Obama dispatching even a small contingent of Americans to Iraq.

"I think that you have to be careful sending special forces because that's a number that has a tendency to grow. And so I'd like to see the context, purpose, timeline and all the rest for anything like that," Pelosi told reporters at her weekly news conference.

Separately, Republican House Speaker John Boehner said he couldn't tell if limited airstrikes would be effective until more was known about overall U.S. strategy.

He said Obama must craft a strategy for combating terrorism in the entire Middle East, not just Iraq. He declared, "This is a very serious problem, very serious."

Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters that he's long called on Obama to take more action against terrorism, which he said has "increased exponentially" under this administration.

"You look at this presidency, and you can't help but get the sense that the wheels are coming off," Boehner said.

Boehner and Pelosi were among the congressional leaders who met with Obama on Iraq Wednesday. The leaders said the president told him they do not believe he needs authorization from Congress for some steps he might take to quell the al-Qaeda-inspired insurgency.


More in:

Comments [1]

Leon from East Harlem

OBAMA F&%Kin' SUCKS !!!! And is this coming from an Ivy League-educated liberal African-American living in Harlem. I voted for him twice hoping he would fix the messes Bush left us. To my dismay, Obama has made things even worse:

- We now have to go back to Iraq to finally vanquish the enemy once and for all (whoever "the enemy" is)
- The ACA is a total disaster despite the spin the WH puts on it. 7M insured? BS! 5M are Medicaid and 2M are business owner booted off their original plans. Moreover, the Exchange plans are inferior to non-exchange plans (e.g., Empire Pathway bought on the NY Insurance Exchange covers only ONE hospital in Manhattan--Lenox Hill.)
- Gitmo is STILL open
- Wall St. got away with murder and Obama's Justice Department as done nothing
- Deportation of "illegals" is higher than all other presidents combined
- Except for Manhattan construction jobs, the job market is in the tank
- Housing foreclosures still at all-time highs
- Income growth slowest since 1965
- People who thought they were going to retire at 65 now have to work well beyond that
- New college grads can't find descent jobs; Georgetown Law grads can't find jobs
- Taxes are higher than ever, yet the domestic and foreign debt continues to rise
- Fracking is ruining our fresh water supply for a little exchange natural gas--which is a more powerful global warming agent than CO2
- China is grabbing the natural resources from Africa and land spacecraft on the moon
- Russia is rebuilding the Soviet Union, and Russia is the only "airline" that flies to the ISS
- And Afghanistan is still a mess with no end in sight
- The 9/11 Memorial is disgrace
- The NSA spies on American citizens, and our "allies"

Nice f&%kin' job, Barack.

Jun. 19 2014 02:37 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by