New Debate Over Piketty's Book On Economic Inequality

Monday, May 26, 2014

Economist Thomas Piketty is defending his book today, from charges that he got his math on rising inequality wrong.

Piketty’s nearly 600-page book, “Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” has been the most hotly debated book this spring over its key conclusion: “The central contradiction of capitalism” is that it leads to the concentration of wealth in the hands of those already rich.

Piketty arrived at this conclusion after analyzing troves of data, which he says show this basic truth about free markets: that they make the rich richer over time.

Piketty’s work set off a new round of debate over income inequality, and earned him praise from Nobel Prize-winning economists and invitations to the White House, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.

But over weekend, the Financial Times published an analysis arguing that Piketty’s “estimates of wealth inequality are undercut by a series of problems and errors.”

Piketty has welcomed the open debate, saying that is why put all his data online, but is arguing that any mistakes with data do not change the fundamental conclusion of his work.

The Economist magazine agrees with Piketty, while critics like Harvard economist Martin Feldstein argue that Piketty’s estimate of increased income inequality in the U.S. is “based on a flawed interpretation of U.S. income data.”

Financial Times’ editor Chris Giles told Here & Now‘s Jeremy Hobson that he was not out looking for faults in Piketty’s work.

“There is a real need to look at this more carefully and try and find out what the truth is, because there are very important issues,” Giles said. “I’m absolutely not in any way saying that wealth inequality is not an important issue that shouldn’t be studied.”


Copyright 2014 WBUR-FM. To see more, visit

Source: NPR


Comments [1]

Jessie Henshaw from Way Uptown

There's a repeated omission from this story that rather changes the message in the end. I won't bore you with the solution since for fine minds all you need is to catch a glimpse of the problem, and then try every possible route to the answer till you find it... ;-)

Sure, there does seems to be a strong case in how our economy works for old money making more money than anything else ***in the end***. That's Piketty's principle r > g. It says "the real productive system constantly loses money".

OK, well, the real question is how we get there ***from a beginning*** when the balance of economic forces is the opposite. That would be the time when the economy worked by the OPPOSITE PRINCIPLE, g > r. When growth begins it's both historical and logically obvious, as a "start-up" that in order to get going " the real productive system is what makes all the money".

What you can deduce from that is that money keeps making more and more money till the real productive system quite.... after getting a head start. That's the problem to solve.

May. 27 2014 02:56 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.