Fewer NYC Students Make the Grade for Gifted Programs

Friday, April 04, 2014 - 05:57 PM

kindergartners at the Icahn Charter School 7 in the Bronx. (Stephen Nessen/WNYC)

Fewer students are eligible for Gifted & Talented public school programs compared to last year, according to test data released by the Department of Education on Friday.

About 38,000 students entering kindergarten through third grade in the fall took the tests earlier this year. Those who scored in the 90th percentile on the exams were deemed eligible for district programs. About 10,000 students met that mark this year. That's compared to just under 12,000 eligible last year.

The bigger drop, however, was at the very top of the scoring range — those who score in the 97th percentile, which makes them eligible for the five highly competitive citywide programs. Last year, 5,450 students were eligible, about 15 percent of all test takers. This year, only 3,432 were eligible, or 9 percent of test takers.

One explanation for the drop could be how the tests were scored. This year, verbal and nonverbal components of the exam were equally weighted. Last year's exams weighted nonverbal scores more heavily, with a student's overall score combined from two-thirds of the nonverbal score and one-third verbal.

“We continue to look at alternative ways to identify gifted students through verbal and non-verbal assessments and promote geographical diversity in these programs,” Department of Education spokeswoman Devora Kaye said in a statement.

District 2, which includes parts of downtown Manhattan and the Upper East Side, saw the most students qualify for citywide gifted programs with nearly 700 students. More students took the exams in that district, than in any other, as well. On the other end of the spectrum, Districts 7 and 23 had the fewest students qualify for the citywide programs, with  fewer than 10 students in each district eligible. District 7 covers the South Bronx. District 23 in Queens includes Brownsville and parts of East New York. 

The exams came under scrutiny last year after a scoring error by testing vendor Pearson was identified and had to be re-scored. Pearson administered this year's exams too, but department officials said they reviewed the company's process to "ensure the implementation of additional procedural safeguards."

One thing that has not changed this year: many more children were eligible to be in a gifted and talented program than there are spaces.

Here is how students performed in each district in the city.

DistrictCitywide Eligible
(Scored 97 percentile or higher)
District Eligible
(Scored 90-96 percentile)
% of students overall who qualified
1 73 115 33%
2 698 879 43%
3 339 427 46%
4 32 34 22%
5 48 69 25%
6 65 118 27%
7 Less than 10 21 10%
8 22 78 15%
9 15 48 12%
10 48 142 17%
11 45 171 14%
12 11 33 10%
13 112 188 35%
14 53 95 33%
15 220 349 36%
16 12 26 17%
17 38 83 17%
18 23 59 12%
19 18 48 13%
20 222 485 29%
21 146 221 29%
22 244 393 27%
23 Less than 10 20 11%
24 135 356 21%
25 125 372 27%
26 161 381 32%
27 56 148 18%
28 190 331 27%
29 34 148 14%
30 127 359 22%
31 101 341 21%
32 10 23 16%


Comments [4]


Wondering why the table in this article is different than the results posted here:

Apr. 17 2014 04:19 PM
Karla from Manhattan

It's not surprising that District 2 that includes some of the wealthiest areas in Manhattan had the highest number of gifted qualifiers. I think that this test alone should not be what divides our kids, especially in the younger grades. The current system is contributing to the segregation of our schools (which are the most segregated in the nation). And the test results of such young kids (4-6- year olds) is hardly valid. Why not wait till they're a little older and include several forms of assessment for qualifying? For more on what I think is wrong with this admissions policy:

Apr. 07 2014 04:08 PM

Now that they know how many make the grade, will there be enough classrooms designated for them? Every year, thousands have to matriculate into regular classrooms or pay to go to private schools because there never was enough gifted classes. All the DOE has to do is look at the previous year, estimate how many will make the grade this year, and plan ahead to move desks around. No brainer.

Apr. 07 2014 09:16 AM

Gifted and Talented should be abolished altogether, at least the name. Labeling children Gifted or Talented implies some innate quality that simultaneously gives them the impressions that their abilities are inherent, and do not require hard work to maintain and grow, which leads to lack of risk taking, and gives other children the impression that no hard work will ever result in their eligibility for such advanced programs. Instead these programs should be called what they are: High Performing.

Apr. 06 2014 09:10 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.