Fed Judge Throws Out NYPD Spying Lawsuit

Thursday, February 20, 2014

muslim, mosque, protest, anti-muslim, NYPD Muslim rights groups at Foley Square on February 3, 2011 protesting NYPD surveillance of Muslims in the city. (Stephen Nessen/WNYC)

The New York Police Department's intelligence unit didn't discriminate against Muslims with far-reaching surveillance aimed at identifying "budding terrorist conspiracies" at Newark mosques and other locations in New Jersey, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.

In a written decision filed in federal court in Newark, U.S. District Judge William Martini dismissed a civil rights lawsuit brought in 2012 by eight Muslims who alleged the NYPD's surveillance programs were unconstitutional because they focused on religion, national origin and race. The suit had accused the department of spying on ordinary people at several mosques, restaurants and grade schools in New Jersey since 2002.

The plaintiffs, including the former principal of a grade school for Muslim girls, "have not alleged facts from which it can be plausibly inferred that they were targeted solely because of their religion," Martini wrote. "The more likely explanation for the surveillance was to locate budding terrorist conspiracies."

The judge added: "The police could not have monitored New Jersey for Muslim terrorist activities without monitoring the Muslim community itself. ... The motive for the program was not solely to discriminate against Muslims, but to find Muslim terrorists hiding among the ordinary law-abiding Muslims."

The ruling also singled out The Associated Press, which sparked the suit with a series of stories based on confidential NYPD document showing how the department sought to infiltrate dozens of mosques and Muslim student groups and investigated hundreds in New York and elsewhere.

"Nowhere in the complaint do the plaintiffs allege that they suffered harm prior to the unauthorized release of documents by The Associated Press," Martini wrote. "This confirms that plaintiffs' alleged injuries flow from the Associated Press's unauthorized disclosure of the documents. ... The Associated Press covertly obtained the materials and published them without authorization. Thus the injury, if any existed, is not fairly traceable to the city."

The Center for Constitutional Rights, which represented the plaintiffs, called the decision troubling.

"In addition to willfully ignoring the harm that our innocent clients suffered from the NYPD's illegal spying program, by upholding the NYPD's blunderbuss Muslim surveillance practices, the court's decision gives legal sanction to the targeted discrimination of Muslims anywhere and everywhere in this country, without limitation, for no other reason than their religion," CCR Legal Director Baher Azmy said.

The city's Law Department had no immediate comment on Thursday. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly had been staunch supporters of the surveillance programs, saying they were needed to protect the city from terrorist attacks.

A similar lawsuit filed in federal court in Brooklyn is still pending.


More in:

Comments [1]

SKV from NYC

This is an appallingly unlawful and unjust ruling.

It says nobody has any right to privacy, even in their places of worship.

It says you can be spied upon without any reasonable suspicion against you, based simply on demographics -- age, gender, religious affiliation, etc.

Of COURSE they were targeted because of their religion. If there had been any legitimate cause for suspicion, the police could've gotten warrants.

This is exactly like the misuse of Stop & Frisk. Throw a net over thousands of innocent people with no reasonable cause, violate all their civil rights, in the name of discovering something you have zero proof for. It's discriminatory, and it's unlawful. Judge William Martini should be ashamed.

And I'm particularly troubled by the "What you don't know won't hurt you" reasoning. Thank God that Edward Snowden didn't agree.

The USA has had more terrorist activity from home-grown right-wing fundamentalists than Muslims. Does ANYBODY think the police are infiltrating and spying on THOSE congregations?

Feb. 21 2014 09:38 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by