Streams

Curiosity Finds Evidence Of Ancient Freshwater Lake On Mars

Monday, December 09, 2013

NASA's Curiosity rover has found evidence of an ancient (nearly) freshwater lake on Mars that could have sustained life billions of years ago.

The salinity in the lake, which covered a small part of the 96-mile-wide Gale Crater, would have been so low that it could "plausibly be described as drinkable," according to The Washington Post. The findings are being published in six separate papers on Monday in the journal Science.

Space.com writes:

"This long and skinny freshwater lake likely existed about 3.7 billion years ago, researchers said, suggesting that habitable environments were present on Mars more recently than previously thought.

" 'Quite honestly, it just looks very Earth-like,' said Curiosity lead scientist John Grotzinger, of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena."

Curiosity analyzed sedimentary rocks called mudstones, "which commonly form in calm, still water," Space.com says. "The mudstones contain clay minerals that formed in the sediments of an ancient freshwater lake, researchers said. Curiosity also spotted some of the key chemical ingredients for life in the samples, including sulfur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and carbon."

Grotzinger says the clay-rich minerals in the rock indicate it was a relatively freshwater lake, making it more suitable to a wider range of possible life forms. "It's the kind of water where if you were really dying, you could drink it, but you probably wouldn't bottle it for resale."

The Post says:

"The chemistry of the lake would have been congenial to organisms known as chemolithoautotrophs — mineral-eaters. Whether such organisms, which thrive on Earth in exotic environments such as caves and deep-sea hydrothermal vents, actually existed on the young Mars is a question Curiosity lacks the tools to answer."

NPR's Geoff Brumfiel says scientists think "the lake was part of a network of streams and aquifers that resembles our own planet."

As Space.com reported in September, there's been a veritable flood of evidence collected by Curiosity over the past several months that water once flowed on Mars.

" 'We know that on Mars there was what we interpret to be a habitable environment, where water was good enough for us to drink,' Melissa Rice, of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, said after a presentation on imaging results from Curiosity's workhorse Mastcam instrument.

"She talked about rocks that Curiosity studied earlier this year, finding evidence that ancient Mars could have supported microbial life.

" 'We know that we had an initial habitable environment when these rocks formed, and then sometime later — we don't know when — these rocks had water flowing through them, through these fractures, leaving calcium sulfate behind,' Rice said. 'We don't know if that era would have also been habitable, but it tells us that there were at least two major wet stages.' "

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Source: NPR

Tags:

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Comments [1]

editor-b from palma

Perhaps then, is there fossils in Mars, life in other planets? But, isn’t the emergence and maintenance of life a process of radical contingency ? That is, is a unique and unrepeatable past totally necessary? Or does life emerge through space like mushrooms in the field when some conditions are present? So, how many conditions are necessary: three, four, trillions, infinite? Only one, water or any sort of God? Is God the word that means infinite conditions? And, how did the life that emerge in a given conditions resist when switching to a different moment? How does life resist time itself, the effects of entropy? Anyway, is it possible for human beings to recognise a simpler life than their own brain only? On the other hand, is it possible to recognise a complex life than their brain, is this the extra-terrestrial life that some people are searching unsuccessfully? But, is there an origin of life or would it be as finding a cut in the material history of the universe, an infinite void that human language patches now? Is this the same cut between life and death? What would you and me be without this cut? Along these lines, scientific-humanistic b-book, a public preview in http://goo.gl/rfVqw6 Just another suggestion for leisure, far away from dogmas or axioms.

Dec. 09 2013 04:21 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.