Streams

Sandy Czar, We Hardly Knew Ye

Tuesday, July 08, 2014

WNYC

The czar in charge of New Jersey's Sandy recovery is resigning in the very same manner in which he ran some 50 programs dispensing federal storm aid: Quietly.

Marc Ferzan's tenure as Gov. Christie's point person for Sandy began in 2012 when the governor still enjoyed bipartisan popularity for the way he handled the immediate aftermath of the storm. But delays in distributing aid, mistakes in calculating need and a damning accusation from Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer hurt Christie's reputation and clouded Ferzan's tenure.

Zimmer had alleged that Ferzan was one of several Christie officials to threaten to take aid away from Hoboken if she didn't support an unrelated development project. Ferzan denied the allegations in a conference call with reporters. That was one of just two times in nearly two years that he took questions from reporters; he also turned down four requests to testify to the Legislature about the status of the recovery from the worst storm in modern New Jersey history.

Likewise, a request today to talk to Ferzan about his resignation was not answered by Christie's spokesman.

Ferzan was well-liked inside the administration, sources said, and he was not pushed out. Notably, all of the Jersey Shore's boardwalks reopened on his watch.

Sources say his departure has been long planned -- he is leaving to take a teaching position at the University of Virginia -- but Christie didn't mention it when he held a Sandy press conference on Monday. Instead the resignation was reported by the Star-Ledger this morning and given secondary mention in a subsequent press release from the governor's office announcing Ferzan's replacement, Terrence Brody. 

"The people of New Jersey are better off for Marc’s leadership and I thank him for his commitment and his service," Christie said in the statement. 

The Sierra Club applauded Ferzan's departure, noting that the state had to cut ties with the biggest Sandy contractor, HGI, over alleged mismanagement. The group also said the state has failed to take rising sea level into account as it rebuilt the coastline after the storm.

Like Ferzan, Brody is an alumnus of the state Attorney General's Office who also had a run-in with Zimmer. Brody was interviewed by Christie's lawyers as part of an internal review of scandals that hit the administration last January, and in a summary of those interviews, Brody described how Zimmer yelled at him on the streets of lower Manhattan. Zimmer was apparently upset that the governor wasn't immediately endorsing her application for a federal grant to protect Hoboken from future flooding: 

"Mayor Zimmer got very upset. The Mayor was emotional and raised her voice, to the point that she was yelling at him. Brody did not recall the exact details of how she responded, but that her remarks generally were that she felt she was not getting enough money for Sandy recovery. Brody then attempted to explain to the Mayor that there were limited funds that could be distributed, that [the Governor's Office of Rebuilding and Recovery] was happy to work with her to protect Hoboken, and that an example of this work was the university study commissioned by GORR to look into the flooding causes, but that he could not get a word in to tell her this information. Before Brody could fully respond, Mayor Zimmer walked away, ending the conversation."

Zimmer hasn't addressed these allegations from Brody, but she ultimately won that grant. And an investigation by NJ Spotlight and WNYC found that the formula used to award Hoboken Sandy aid was flawed and not calculated accurately.  Administration officials attributed any shortfall to data-entry mistakes, not political revenge.

Tags:

Comments [2]

tom LI

angela, while I agree with the sexism in the emotional versus assertive characterizing that goes on. However, I think its about time for women to own the emotional label. "Of course I'm emotional, I take my job seriously!" Seems like an honest comeback for a female when she gets the emotional label.

Also women need to start to describe men in the same ways. Turn the tables. Men dont hide their emotions that well, and when a male raises his voice in a "difficult" situation, its likely because he's losing control, because he's getting emotional. Something is being stirred up, and the raised voice is his default mechanism, as a means to shut the other party down.

Flip the game on men! And dont let anyone discount, and/or denigrate the emotionally strong side of women! Own it! Make it a source of power, not a weapon to be used against you.

Jul. 09 2014 03:52 PM
angela from Colorado

I get so tired of men describing women as EMOTIONAL whenever they get mad and raise their voice. If it was a man, he would have been described as "assertive". I think this guy has resigned as a result of the ongoing investigation into fraud and abuse in the Christy administration.

Jul. 09 2014 10:39 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored