Does Chris Christie Owe Hoboken $700,000?

Wednesday, March 05, 2014

NJ Spotlight
Beichen Li rides his bike down a flooded street after Hurricane Sandy, Oct. 30, 2012 in Hoboken, New Jersey. (Michael Bocchieri/Getty)

The amount of Sandy aid that’s at the heart of Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer’s accusation against the Christie administration was initially determined through a faulty selection and scoring process, documents show.

An investigation by WNYC and NJ Spotlight has found that by using the Christie administration’s own scoring criteria, seven of Hoboken’s requests for backup generators should have been funded instead of just one, making it potentially eligible for up to $700,000 instead of the $142,080 the city was awarded.

Zimmer has claimed her city was shortchanged because she refused to support a redevelopment project favored by a close ally of Governor Christie. Top officials in the governor's office immediately disputed that claim.

The money in the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Energy Allocation Initiative has yet to be distributed, and when these scoring inaccuracies were brought to the administration’s attention, it said it was making adjustments and correcting problems and would take this investigation’s findings into consideration.

“While you raise some questions about what you think could be problems with the process, we’re still in the process,” said Larry Ragonese, spokesman for the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection.

Questions about the integrity of the scoring data, however, appear to extend beyond simply a few errant numbers to more structural issues concerning the methodologies used in the ranking process, and the problems run to many more towns than Hoboken. Some cities were awarded much less than they should have been—and some were awarded more.

For example, a review of the initial scoring shows many municipalities received unequal treatment. Nutley—which had comparatively little damage from Sandy or past storms—got $556,240, while places like Atlantic City and Belmar weren’t awarded any funding at all.

“Whenever you see these things, you don’t know the subjectivity of who’s populating these columns and these boxes,” said Mark Mauriello, who worked at the NJ Department of Environmental Protection for three decades until 2010. He reviewed the data before speaking with WNYC and reporting partner, NJ Spotlight.

“And obviously, the more of these columns you have, the more opportunities you have to check off a box and add weight or points to a certain proposal. It just seems to me that this thing by nature creates a lot of opportunity to really make funding decisions that might not be in the best interest of the state.”

To be clear, the $25 million Hazard Mitigation Grant Program—the focus of this investigation—is only a small fraction of the overall Sandy aid money.  But it’s one of the few grants given directly to local municipalities, and it’s also one of the few over which the Christie administration has complete control.

The Christie Administration has declined a request to release data on its funding decisions. But a spreadsheet obtained by the New Jersey chapter of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) was shared with WNYC.

According to that document as well as information supplied by the Governor’s Office of Recovery and Rebuilding, applicants were awarded points for a variety of factors including population, density and disaster history. Using those criteria and the ranking system identified by state officials, WNYC and NJ Spotlight conducted its own scoring and found instances of similar grant applications from different municipalities receiving unequal treatment. In multiple cases, applicants were awarded points they never should have gotten, and the scoring methodology appears to have favored a select few applicants at the expense of the majority in several key rankings.

According to documents reviewed by WNYC and NJ Spotlight, Hoboken submitted seven requests totaling about $100 million for HMGP funding, for everything from building a two-mile long floodwall to flood-proofing the city’s historic library to turning vacant land into parks to reduce storm water runoff.

It was ambitious, for sure, and after Hoboken's Mayor Zimmer came forward with her allegations that Christie administration officials had threatened withholding Sandy aid money, the governor’s office released a press release portraying Hoboken as foolish for ever asking for so much. But it turns out $100 million wasn’t the highest request, and it wasn’t out of the ballpark of what several other municipalities had requested.

Documents WNYC and NJ Spotlight received in response to public records requests show Brick Township, for example, requested a total of $241 million, and the City of Elizabeth—which, though larger, suffered much less damage than Hoboken—asked for funding for 21 projects totaling $62 million.

As for the energy-related request Hoboken had made—$1.7 million for 12 backup generators at critical facilities like police and fire departments, shelters and the ambulance squad—the city was notified in October that it would receive just $142,080 through the Energy Allocation Initiative, a small fraction of what it had asked for.

For comparison’s sake, our investigation looked at the energy requests submitted by Brick Township.

Brick officials bundled their requests for nine different generators into a single letter of intent totaling $1,260,000, and they attached an itemized list to their application, giving a breakdown of how much each generator would cost. Hoboken similarly submitted a single letter of intent for 12 different generators totaling $1,770,000.

But in Brick's case, the state used the itemized list the township had provided to give it a separate line item on the score sheet for eight of the nine generators it had asked for (the ninth request was excluded for reasons that are unclear). This process worked greatly to Brick’s advantage and it received an overall allocation totaling $380,000.

In Hoboken’s case, rather than getting separate line items for each of its 12 requests, the city inexplicably received just three line items. It also received fewer points than it deserved for having conducted energy audits and for having had a history of flooding.  

Also, Hoboken only received 10 out of 20 points in the population density ranking, despite being the fourth most densely-populated city in both the state and the nation (administration officials defended their scoring methodology, noting that Guttenberg—the city at the top of this ranking—has a density nearly one-and-a half times that of Hoboken).

The bar was set similarly high in the population ranking category, such that Newark and Jersey City—the state’s first and second largest municipalities— only received five out of a possible 20 points. Elizabeth, the state’s fourth largest city, did not receive any points for its population. Full credit was awarded, however, to a handful of county applicants and statewide agencies, which administration officials said had the effect of prioritizing "regional" projects, as called for by the recommendations of the President's Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force.

Belmar’s request to fund a generator for an emergency evacuation shelter was similarly denied because it didn’t receive any credit for its public assistance history, despite having requested more than $2.6 million over the past 15 years (which should have earned it an additional 40 points).

Jersey City’s $3.5 million request for 22 generators only received an allocation of $159,840 because the generator request was given just a single line item on the score sheet.  The city also missed an opportunity to get backup power for its traffic lights because that application was shortchanged in the FEMA Public Assistance ranking.

The scoring irregularities also worked to benefit some communities. Morristown and Nutley incorrectly received hundreds of thousands of dollars for backup generators, despite having comparatively little disaster history. Had the scoring been done properly and according to the rules, it appears that none of their requests should have been approved. Likewise for Creskill, Dover, Monroe Township (Middlesex County), Mount Arlington, North Caldwell and Old Tappan.

A spokesman for the city of Hoboken released a statement in response to the WNYC/NJ Spotlight’s findings. “This investigation adds to the growing body of evidence that the Christie Administration’s process of distributing Sandy funds has been flawed, politicized and subject to abuse,” it said.

Briefed on the investigation’s findings, State Senator Ray Lesniak—a frequent critic of the administration—called for an independent audit of the state’s distribution of Sandy aid money. “We’re going to have to just add that to our lengthening list of investigations,” he said.

For its part, the state now appear to be back-pedaling.

As part of the State’s ongoing quality control and assurance process,” state officials wrote in a letter to grant applicants a few days after a reporter first confronted them with the scoring improprieties, “the cross-agency working group continues to review each data point, confirm accuracy, make any needed adjustments, and ensure that the data is correct before finalizing and submitting project applications to FEMA (no projects have yet been submitted).”

Despite having asked each municipality for a plan on how it would spend its grant, the state is now saying there may be changes.

“We will contact you promptly in the event that any adjustments are required,” the letter said.

Read More at NJ Spotlight.


More in:

Comments [10]

Bill Wolfe from Bordentown, NJ

Does WNYC and NJ Spotlight have a response to DEP's response to your story?

Larry Ragonese of DEP Press Office used extraordinarily harsh rhetoric - calling it "X-files".

Star Ledger printed it without any qualification - you guys need to stan by your story and expose the lies and spin from the Administration, especially DEP.

Mar. 06 2014 04:39 PM
Melissa from Hoboken

Hey, Mark. The flooding issues in Hoboken date back to the 1800s, when the marshy western half of Hoboken was drained & filled and roads elevated to a few feet above mean high tide. Since then, the land has settled and sea level has risen, and all the available land in Hoboken has been built up over an ancient combined sewer/storm water runoff system, which, by the way, the city doesn't control (North Hudson Sewerage Authority does). You can find more on the history of flooding at the Hoboken Museum's exhibit, "Hoboken, One Year After Sandy," it's open through July 6 (Museum is in the Shipyard complex, 1301 Hudson St.)

If you have a couple trillion dollars lying around to either elevate the town (like Galveston after the big flood) and also rebuild the sewer system to separate storm water runoff from sewerage, or else create a new multi-faceted storm surge/overflow water management system like the one proposed by the Rebuild by Design team, I'm sure the city would quickly get to work solving the deep puddle situation you encountered. If you don't have a few trillion dollars, then we'll all have to suck it up and pay higher taxes and flood insurance rates, or go begging to the state and federal government for funds to chip away at the problem. Parts of Brooklyn and other cities are facing the exact same problem: Aging combined storm water/sewer systems combined with dense urban landscape and rising sea levels, and there's no quick fix. Fortunately, we can look to the Netherlands for answers, but none of them come cheap.

Mar. 06 2014 11:07 AM

All I know is that Hoboken sure hasn't improved anything as far as flooding goes. Last time I was walking through there a couple days after a snowstorm I stepped in a puddle which I thought was two inches deep or so since it was so wide but my foot just kept sinking down up over the top of my boot. I was pretty amazed that these kind of drainage problems were still common in Hoboken so long after Sandy. If melting snow can make giant puddles like that next time there's a hurricane it's just going to be the exact same flood as last time.

Mar. 05 2014 06:42 PM
Scott Gurian

Howard - to answer your question about whether there are patterns of relationship with the Christie administration among communities that did and didn't their fair share of aid money: While it's the case that places like Jersey City and Atlantic City -- whose mayors have not been on the best of terms with the Governor -- appear to have been shortchanged, and many Republican towns and places where local leaders endorsed the Gov. for reelection appear to have gotten more than their fair share, it's not a total black and white situation. In our analysis, we found several examples including Brick Twp. and Bloomfield where some money was allocated, but even more should have been given according to the state's own scoring rules. If you haven't already, check out our article at for more details on this story.

Mar. 05 2014 11:41 AM

corruption is corruption regardless of party affiliation. Christie is another typical NJ politician. Impeach the bum.

Mar. 05 2014 10:20 AM
Martha Lorini

Scott--Have been revelling in your reporting on this issue. Keep up the great work--and so good to hear your voice.

Mar. 05 2014 10:05 AM

In regards to the Al Gore frustration - we all have to endure those things no matter how we vote. I heard Gov Christie telling children his favorite part of being Governor is he gets to close off the Holland Tunnel and have it for himself when he wants to come to NYC, There us nothing to investigate there. Politicians and elites of all sorts are privileged worldwide.

Now imagine that happened for 4 days straight planned for 30 days. Imagine there was no off ramp. No other way to go so you had to sit in a car for 4 hours trying to get your children to the 1st day of school or your first day of work after being unemployed for a year. Now imagine that was because of a petty disagreement between Al Gore and the Toll Booth worker on the I-95. Wouldn't you want that investigated? Wouldn't you not only want the toll booth worker fired, but want to know how he got away with this for days and why his supervisor didn't ask any questions?

Now then when they started looking, all these other abusive behaviors started showing up like withholding sandy funds and giving out $1 leases to companies on $900,000 leases to lets imagine it was one of Al Gore's closest ally's guys? Something stinks in NJ and I am not talking about the industrial factories in Newark. I am looking south to Trenton for that nasty stank.

Mar. 05 2014 09:49 AM
Nancy Lamensdorf from Basking Ridge, NJ

Honestly, I am so fed up with all of these "investigations" into the Christie administration! Corruption takes many forms; currently there are 6-7 so called investigations at the State level, paid for of course by the NJ tax payer. They are politically motivated investigations and a waste of tax payer money. When I first moved back to NJ years ago, I was traveling home from the city on I-95 when suddenly there was a road block and NJ State troopers were shooing drivers off the highway. I totally panicked because I did not know my way around the highways at the time. I begged the trooper to let me continue and he explained the road was closed. "Interstate 95 is closed?!?" I asked. "Yes, ma'am, it is closed. You have to exit here". The reason why it was closed was that Al Gore had visited the city and was also traveling on I-95. I was steamed when I learned that but I hardly wanted to launch an investigation! My point is that in this area, roads are constantly closed or diverted, sometimes due to construction projects (when no work is even happening), sometimes due to weather conditions, sometimes due to visiting politicians. I'm sorry to say this, but it was no big deal what happened by the Bridge. We are used to it and expect these things. I am wayyyyy tired of my tax dollars being spent on these political witch hunts!

Mar. 05 2014 08:52 AM
Howard Sherman

Is there any pattern of relationship with the Christie administration among those townships and communities that got MORE than their fair share of resources?

Mar. 05 2014 08:38 AM
Paul Simons from Levittown PA

The evidence of wrongdoing by the Christie administration from the top on down is piling up. It is becoming a textbook definition of the word "corruption". The pattern it shows is that of a greedy despot rewarding underlings who are subservient to him and punishing those who are not. It's time for an impartial law enforcement department with teeth - if there is one - to do its job and remove these people from positions of power.

Mar. 05 2014 08:12 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by