Do No Harm? One Doctor Says Physicians Should Take Part In Executions

The Takeaway | Apr 26, 2017

Click on the 'Listen' button above to hear this interview. 

In Arkansas, the ongoing battle within the criminal justice system took a new turn earlier this week.

On Monday, the state put two convicted murderers to death — it was the first time for any state had carried out a double execution since the year 2000. Another condemned man is scheduled to be executed on Thursday. Initially, The Natural State planned to carry out eight executions in 11 days. This effort was driven by Midazolam — one of three execution drugs — which is set to expire at the end of this month.

When it comes to administering the lethal cocktail, the American Medical Association (AMA) objects to doctor participation for ethical reasons. It goes against the Hippocratic Oath, in which physicians swear to heal or do no harm to patients.

Dr. Sandeep Jauhar, a cardiologist, and author of the books "Intern" and "Doctored," disagrees with the AMA's view. In an op-ed for our partners at The New York Times, Dr. Jauhar states that although he opposes capital punishment, doctors should be present at executions to minimize prisoner suffering.

Top Stories

City Politics: E-Bike Regulations and AOC's Path to 2028

Teen drowns at Rockaway Beach after lifeguards clear their shifts for the day

Retirement Is About Time, Not Just Money

How Socialist Is the D.S.A.? Megan Romer Explains

YOU ARE ONLINE