Bernhard Ostrolenk

Thursday, February 12, 1942

This episode is from the WNYC archives. It may contain language which is no longer politically or socially appropriate.

Described as the third in a series presented by City College on the general subject "The Democracies will Win." Today's speech is titled "The Tools of Victory: Man power and machine power." The speaker is Bernhard Ostrolenk of the Department of Economics at City College.

He notes the president's achievements toward defense in 1941. Despite fifth columnists and isolationist there were great strides in industrial preparation. Now, in 1942, the United States has quickened the pace and is in an "all out defense program." Ostrolenk notes the many ways the US has prepared: he notes the great defense expenditures - expected to soon be a billion dollars a week. Likewise, imports of essential raw materials has increased notably. Aircraft production has also increased 20% in the past five years, while technological advances have been made.
The Navy has grown, as has the tool industry.

Budgets have eliminated new building construction, food production has also increased dramatically.

Audio courtesy of the City University of New York

WNYC archives id: 71474


Bernhard Ostrolenk


More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.


About Our Stake in the War

Broadcast in cooperation with CUNY, this 1942 wartime radio show features members of faculty discussing different aspects of Americanism, the war effort, and the threat of un-democratic ideas.


Supported by