Sarah Palin: Is There Anything She Can't Do?

Friday, October 29, 2010 - 09:10 AM

Karol Markowicz

Having already covered that any and all rage can be directed at Sarah Palin, today's topic is Sarah Palin and her obvious superpowers. The reality show star, the news commentator and the mother of a Dancing with the Stars contestant is both the most amazing politician who ever lived and also the worst. She's that versatile.

Writing in the Daily Caller yesterday, Dorian Davis blames her for Republicans likely not capturing the Senate on Tuesday. This is amazing for several reasons. For one thing, it hasn't happened yet: this might be the first time Sarah Palin is blamed for something that only may happen. For another thing, Republicans need to capture 10 seats to win control of the Senate. That is, as I can imagine Palin saying, a whole heck of a lot. Davis writes:

Her backing of Tea Party candidate Joe Miller over incumbent GOP senator Lisa Murkowski in Alaska’s primaries, for instance, led to pointless drama: a Miller upset and subsequent Murkowski write-in campaign. Despite a minor speed bump though — the latest CNN/Time poll has Murkowski and Miller tied at 37 percent each and the National Republican Senatorial Committee is spending $160,000, a small fraction of its budget, to keep an otherwise safe seat from falling into Democratic hands — experts at least expect the GOP to hold Alaska.

So her big crime is supporting the candidate she thinks is best for the job? Scandalous!

Here's a reminder of what happens when people support a candidate just for the sake of the party. In 2004, Pat Toomey ran for the Republican nomination to US Senate from Pennsylvania against sitting Senator, and walking disaster, Arlen Specter. Specter, while having the requisite (R) following his name, was trouble for Republicans. He was an unreliable Republican vote who supported amnesty for illegal immigrants and eventually a public healthcare option, and whose power was growing with each year he spent in the Senate.

George W. Bush and then-US Senator from Pennsylvania Rick Santorum campaigned for Specter because the party apparently came before their principles. Their support gave Specter the narrow edge and thus the election. Santorum would go on to lose his own seat, at least in part because conservatives in Pennsylvania were still bitter over his support of Specter. And Specter? The guy who we all had to support because he was a Republican? He's not a Republican anymore. Out of political expediency, which ended up backfiring on him, he became a Democrat in 2009.

This is why supporting a candidate can not only be about party; it must also be an alignment of values and trust in the person's ability. Sarah Palin is doing the right thing backing candidates who appeal to her personally. That's what a private citizen should do. Her endorsement carries that much more weight because of it. No one considers her a party shill, and she doesn't always pick the strong horse. Davis writes that her support of Christine O'Donnell will cost Republicans the Delaware Senate seat. Perhaps, but who knows if Republicans would have won it anyway? Now if Palin had supported Mike Castle that would have lost her some credibility. He was a fine candidate, but it would have been clear that Palin was picking him out of political calculation, not because she agreed with him on the issues.

Ultimately, Palin has influence, but she isn't the be-all end-all in conservative politics. Voters make their own decisions, and to blame (or cheer) Palin for those choices is farfetched.

Born in the Soviet Union and raised in Brooklyn, Karol Markowicz is a public relations consultant in NYC and a veteran of Republican campaigns in four states. She blogs about politics at Alarming News and about life in the city with her husband and baby at 212 BabyShe can be followed on Twitter.


More in:

Comments [6]

Kathy from San Diego, CA

Yes, there is alot Sarah Can't do. Get a good education, say nice things, raise decent kids. Palin is a failure at everything, dropped out of community colleges, her kids have been in jail and have noeducation, she can stay home and take care of her already retarded kid. Palin is a mess, Palin trolls for $$. Palin is a vile women.

Jan. 09 2011 11:44 PM

Title of Article: "Sarah Palin: Is There Anything She Can't Do?"

Making a coherent statement.
Answer questions from reporters.
Become president.

Oct. 31 2010 06:17 PM
Julie from Seattle

One thing Sarah Palin can't seem to do is complete a sensible, grammatically sound sentence.

Oct. 30 2010 04:30 AM
gahanson from minnesota

It wasn't too long ago that the very idea that the gop could win back the senate was dismissed out of hand as wishful thinking. Then someone, I don't know who, said that the gop could win the senate. Then the loons started saying if they don't win the senate it will be Palin's fault. What a bunch of BS that is, to say the least.

Why not blame it on Romney for having supported a poor candidate for governor in CA, Whitman, who is headed for defeat by Jerry Brown, and may very well drag Carley Fiorena down with her. Why not blame Karl Rove if Christine O'Donnell loses, after all, it was Karl who was PO'd that his candidate didn't win, and went on a campaign of trashing O'Donnell for weeks on end, and is still doing it.

Why not blame it on Pawlenty, surely he could have down more than campaign in several rather safe districts.

We know what the gop "leadership" is like, and we know that they want to take Palin down, but it isn't going to work.

Oct. 29 2010 06:27 PM
Karol from NYC

Oh, so another thing that hasn't actually happened yet? You may not know this but Sarah Palin has never run for POTUS. I know, I know, it's a surprising fact.

Oct. 29 2010 12:49 PM

is there anything Sarah Palin can't do?? You betch - win a campaign for POTUS!

Oct. 29 2010 12:17 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by