Streams

Bullhorn: End The War on Drugs, Obama

Friday, October 08, 2010

If Barack Obama and the Democrats really wanted to re-arouse the coalition of voters that gave Obama the White House two years ago, all it would take is a single issue we aren’t hearing about amidst the earnest back-and-forths over health care, TARP and taxing small business.

That issue is the War on Drugs. That this decades-long policy has not made hard drugs any cheaper and siphons off resources from overtaxed police forces is bad enough. However, the War on Drugs is a tragedy for a more specific reason: it is the main thing keeping America from getting past race.

If the Obama Administration took this up, not only black America but a massive proportion of America’s moderates, liberals, and leftists would get behind it as well. The end of today’s version of Prohibition would be as galvanizing a selling point as, say, Obama’s blackness and coolness was. It would be revolutionary, again, and for real.

Ask almost any black person why they feel that America is still a deeply racist country, and what is on their minds is not abstractions such as black people getting slightly lesser car loans than white people, or subtle psychological tests that show whites more likely to associate blacks with negative concepts like laziness, and so on. What is key to making many blacks feel racism in America is the cops.

Quite simply, police forces are assigned to trawl low-income, high minority areas for drug sales, because this is where drug sales most often go on in the open air – along with the violence often in its wake. As a result, countless innocent people are stopped and frisked. To people living in such areas it feels like they are under siege by the police – I have heard innocent thirteen year old boys from the projects already complaining that they wish the cops would leave them alone.

Pretty soon you have a young man who thinks of the mainstream world as an alternate universe. Not to mention even successful black men recounting being stopped for “Driving While Black” and searched for drugs. Or a black Harvard professor like Henry Louis Gates overreacting to an encounter with the police out of a fear that he was being treated similarly.

Worse, because selling drugs is illegal, their street cost is high, there’s a potential living to be made out on “them corners.” No, most of the “slingers” do not get rich – but there is always the hope that one might, and it keeps the wolf from the door. The War on Drugs provides an ever-standing opportunity to make a living outside of the law with your friends. And when you’re growing up, it’s what you see every second man you know doing. When you do it too, you go to jail (or die), sometimes leaving kids behind who will grow up without a dad. With no War on Drugs, these same young black men would do exactly what we, their families, and deep down even they wish they would do: get real jobs.

Take away the War on Drugs and make drugs available for a reasonable amount in pharmacies. It would be the only way to keep the trade off the streets, just as alcohol is available for a reasonable amount in liquor stores (which sounded horrific to those who supported Prohibition). Divert the money now wasted on the War on Drugs to serious rehabilitation efforts. For the record, studies show that addiction rates do not rise when Prohibition laws are pulled back.

Prohibition really is the word – it is a blot on this nation that television shows like the current Boardwalk Empire, as well as hit books like Dry Manhattan and Last Call, have us smugly laughing at Prohibition in 1920s and yet we accept Prohibition 2010 as just the way it has to be. A month barely goes by in New York when there isn’t some seedy tragedy where a black or Latino teen or twenty-something is shot dead over what is almost always traceable to people maintaining turf for selling drugs. The shooters, if found, almost always have records – and the records are almost always connected to “them corners.” An end to the War on Drugs would profoundly change all of this.

Last I heard, Obama’s drug policy czar Gil Kerlikowske was saying of the War on Drugs “It’s not something the President and I discuss; it’s not even on the agenda.” Understandable – there’s quite a bit on the plate at present. Realistically we can’t even expect Obama to run on an anti-War on Drugs policy in 2012. However, imagine if he and his crew started pushing the point as of the midterm elections in 2014, and carried the effort through his second term.

There would be no problem with reanimating the excitement people felt watching Obama take the prize two falls ago. Pitched properly as a policy that is not only sensible but also eliminates what can feel like a war on black men, a commitment to ending the War on Drugs nationwide would give countless people the opportunity to participate in the revolution that so many are waiting for. Just Say No indeed.

John McWhorter is a contributing editor at City Journal and The New Republic and is a lecturer at Columbia University. His latest book is Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: Untold Stories in the History of English.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [3]


If Obama had kept the promise he seemed to personify throughout his campaign, his presidency would have been
" . . . revolutionary, . . . and for real. . . "

But clearly he is neither, as demonstrated by the values his performance has been shaped by over the past two years as well as by the past information that was made unavailable during the campaign.

What a tragedy for us all.

Mar. 04 2011 11:31 PM
Ken Halten from Clemson, SC

EXCELLENT article Mr.McWhorter, unfortunately, the majority of the American public still just DON'T GET IT. The 'war on drugs' is not what it states to be -- it is no less than a WAR ON FREEDOM. From the uneducated such as 'Karol from NYC' who obviously has never been to Amsterdam, to the people who are discriminated against by drug testing in the workplace (why does me smoking a joint three weekends ago affect my ability to get a job?), America has simply not awakened to the TRUTH yet, the truth of tyranny!

Even ending the illegitimate war south of the border & the possible endless tax revenue that TRUE LEGALIZATION would spur do not seem to be anywhere near the headlines that they should be. I hope Americans wake up soon, the only real American thing to do is FULL LEGALIZATION & TAXATION of ALL RECREATIONAL DRUGS ! (Lead the way, Cali ! )

Then there's the ridiculous racial component, which ought to be reason enough alone, for full legalization. The policemen are so brainwashed that they probably don't even realize the damage they're causing to the country. From a middle-aged, professional white-man who doesn't even use drugs.. WAKE UP Mr.Obama (listen to your BLACK 1/2, FOR ONCE!!) -- you COULD go down in history as the MAN THAT FIXED AMERICA !!!

Oct. 19 2010 02:01 PM
Karol from NYC

I think people would more readily support an end to the war on drugs than they would outright legalization of drugs. Not criminalizing drug use doesn't have to mean accepting it completely like we do alcohol. Personally, I mixed on legalizing. I'm sure other people are as well. While I would like drugs to be legal in theory, I don't want the US to become Amsterdam (seedy, scary, drug addicts everywhere) in practice.

Oct. 08 2010 04:28 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by