Streams

Dueling Points of View on Manhattan's New Skyline

Monday, August 23, 2010

A picture is worth a thousand words—and millions of dollars.

Those are the stakes for which two midtown real estate giants are playing in the fight over 15 Penn Plaza, a proposed 1,216-foot skyscraper that would be constructed within a quarter mile of the Empire State Building and challenge that icon’s status on the skyline.

Each side showed up at a City Council hearing Monday with rival renderings of what the tower would look like—and what damage it would do to the skyline, if any.

“Most of these rendering that we’ve seen from them are grossly inaccurate, do not actually reflect the articulation, the meticulous detail,” David Greenbaum, president of the New York office of Vornado Realty Trust, told reporters outside the hearing. “We are talking about world class architecture by Pelli Clarke Pelli, who have designed some of the great buildings across the planet.”

Vornado is the developer behind 15 Penn, which would be located where the Hotel Pennsylvania now stands at 33rd Street and 7th Avenue. It’s asking the City Council for permission to build 56 percent more floor space than allowed under current zoning, a bonus that’s worth millions of dollars over time.

Greenbaum was criticizing images distributed by the owners of the Empire State Building, less than four blocks away at 34th Street and Fifth Avenue, and just 34 feet higher at the top floor. Anthony Malkin, the most outspoken of those owners, admitted that his renderings might be off slightly—but charged that Vornado’s drawings were equally misleading.

“That is a very artful and best possible representation,” Malkin said of the developer’s image. “Clearly, we did not choose the best representation. That would not serve our purpose, nor would it serve theirs.”

Vornado distributed twilight images, taken from the north, which would emphasize how far away the two buildings were and also how its glass tower would glow in the fading sunlight. Malkin’s images were taken from the east or the west, showing the two towers closer together.

The City Council is not being asked to approve the design, only several zoning changes to allow a larger building constructed closer to the street. Vornado hasn’t found any tenant to rent in its tower and says it is still years away from construction—which means the design could still change too.

The full Council could vote as early as Wednesday.

View of the Manhattan skyline with proposed skyscraper by Pelli Clarke Pelli. (Photo courtesy of Pelli Clarke Pelli)

 

View of the Manhattan skyline with proposed skyscraper by Pelli Clarke Pelli, by the detractors of the project. (Photo courtesy of Friends of NYC Skyline) 

 

 

Tags:

More in:

Comments [10]

John from LES

Before I even looked at the caption I was like "yup, another Ceasar Pelli clone". Come on Cesar is that all you've got? 30 Hudson - Jersey City; IFC1 & IFC2 - Hong Kong; whatsie in Shanghai.....What you do just change the adress on the drawings?

Aug. 25 2010 05:47 PM
Jonathan from Manhattan

I like that Paris has restrictions on building height.

But sorry, NYC isn’t Paris.

Aug. 25 2010 12:00 PM
z from manhattan

as an architect, i do think the skyline should be considered. how about an empire state buffer zone? i do, though, have no problem with the height, up is always better than out.

Aug. 25 2010 11:59 AM
Colette from Chelsea

Great cities need great (tall) buildings

Aug. 25 2010 11:57 AM
brian

Where are the solar panels and wind turbines?

Aug. 25 2010 11:57 AM

so what. we'll get used to it.

Aug. 25 2010 11:54 AM

Ya know it's funny people say this new building is ugly and shoudln't be built but what's it gonna hurt. Too fancy looking maybe. Too tall. I don't see the issue really. Take cars for instance. Cars are being rebuilt and revamped constantly. I bet the people who say this new building is ugly drive some foriegn, futuristic gas saver wich is good but come on now. Change is inevidable. It doesn't matter what you think or what I think. Things are gonna change and cities are gonna grow. Just thank God that you get to wake up every morning and not worry about what a building is gonna look like. Life is short. Live it.

Aug. 25 2010 11:01 AM
Robert Poda from New York

I don't see a problem with the tower location. However, with the Mosque controversy, I have an idea - why not move the Mosque uptown and build the proposed tower downtown.

Robert Poda

Aug. 24 2010 01:14 PM
Tovar from Manhattan

I like it!

its sleek, especially with its taper. More to the point however, I now want to see this built because of the stupidity of the opposition to it. I mean, should the city be stuck in time, simply frozen for sentimental reasons? I'm surprised the skyline hasn't already changed dramatically. Such NIMBYISM in this city...

Aug. 24 2010 11:21 AM
Janet Hawkins from Rye

UGLY!!!

Aug. 24 2010 10:13 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by