Photo credit: @julesdwit.
A not-for-profit media organization supported by people like you.
To Raconteuse: You were right, and Mary Cygan was right. Apparently it was the discussion on the air that strayed. As a sometime fiction writer, I use the past perfect to introduce a previous event. One only has to use it once to set the time, and then return to the simple past, sometimes called the "narrative" past. Cheers to all.
To posting 8, Mary Cygan:I don't understand. Isn't that what I wrote? The past perfect is formed by HAD + the past participle of a verb, as in: We had drunk all the beer by the time Joe turned up at the party. I find most people now use the simple past.
Recently found out that "Zero sum gain"/"zero some gain"...is really "zero sum GAME"...I always knew what it meant but I had NO IDEA "why" it "meant"...now I know!
My old boss would say: "That's like beating a dead horse...with a stick..'til it's dead"...which still CRACKS me up! That's what I'd really call a waste of time!
Something that has really started to bug me is the way that people use the word "technically." I overheard someone say this yesterday: "Technically I could take the M train, but then I would have to walk ten blocks." The word technically is completely unnecessary in that sentence. Is anyone else bothered by that?
Re: Approve/Approve of
I think I disagree with your caller on this one. In the context of a political ad, "I approve this message." is correct.
There are two senses of approve--to agree with, and to grant permission. In a political ad, the candidate is explicitly using the second sense, putting them in compliance with campaign finance laws.
A candidate can approve of all sorts of things, but can only approve actions taken in their name.
There has been plenty of media reporting these days using the terms "Opposition Leader" and "regime change." What exactly a do these things mean and how do they apply to the US political climate?
I keep hearing clerks in stores say, "will the following customer please step down," when they are referring to the next person in line. This sounds incorrect to me, but I can't explain why, grammatically. Am I correct that this is grammatically incorrect, and if so, why?
I've always wondered what is the numerical value associated with the word "several." A lot of people say it's any value more than a couple. I always say it has to be seven or more, perhaps because of the sound... Or am I just being stubborn?
Can the word maven please comment on whether she believes the profileration of youtube.com and it's "comment" feature supports an increase of incorrect grammar as over 85% of the comments I've read are misspelled?
Take vs. Bring
The time to use one vs. the other seems very clear to me though i can't seem to explain it to a friend that consistently uses bring when take sounds like the correct choice to me. For instance:"could you bring this to the post office for me", even if neither of us are already going there.
My mother always used the expression "coggily wobbles" to refer to an upset stomach. I am 65 from Maryland. Perhpas this expression was used in the 1940s in the South.
I've never heard the word "ulterior" used except in association with the word "motive". Do you know of any other usages?
I thought the question Patricia T. O'Connor received asked "what happened to the past perfect tense?" But the discussion that followed seemed to concern the subjunctive mood not the past perfect tense.
Rather than sentences with "would have" constructions, an example would be:
She had finished singing before they left.
Past perfect tense makes it possible to show the sequence of two events in the past.
Why not call a restaurant owner in the US an entréepreneur!
It's actually on the LAM, no B.
where does the term "on the lamb" come from
Can you tell me what's happened to the past perfect tense? Hardly anyone uses it properly anymore: HAD + past participle of a verb.
Also, why is it Americans pronounce the FA found in the middle of words as FI; case in point, Lafayette and Rafael. In the US, this latter one is often shortened to Rafi, when in the Hispanic world, it's Rafa.
Hey, in Yorkshire and much of Northern England they say, "Where there's muck, there's brass (money)!"
I think I've missed Patricia's segment today. Will catch on MP3 later, but question: Why are so many folks saying "than me," "than her," "than us," etc.? Of course, they use this locution only at the ends of sentences where the the complete clause with verb "than I AM, she IS, or than we ARE" is only implied. It is driving me nuts. Help!---old grammar teacher, formerly at Riverdale Country School.
On email and other written communication, I am noticing an ever-increasing amount of people who pluralize nouns by adding an apostrophe-s. And not just in the professional world but in the education world as well. I've seen a PTO email that read "We need Dad's to chaperone the field trip" My son's preschool posted a flyer, "Fundraising check's are due on Friday!"
You might ask Patricia if it is correct to refer to someone as having bounced BETWEEN fourteen foster homes, as today's host just did at the beginning of the show. The WNYC web page uses both between and among on the show description today--I guess they are hedging their bets.
Email addresses are required but never displayed.
Leonard Lopate hosts the conversation New Yorkers turn to each afternoon for insight into contemporary art, theater, and literature, plus expert tips about the ever-important lunchtime topic: food.
Sign up for the Book Club e-newsletter
Subscribe on iTunes
Leonard Lopate Weekend: Jeffrey Horowitz & John Douglas Thompson, Joseph Stiglitz, and Elisabeth Rosenthal
WNYC 93.9 FM and AM 820 are New York's flagship public radio
stations, broadcasting the finest programs from NPR and PRI, as well as a wide range of award-winning local
programming. WNYC is a division of
New York Public Radio.