Streams

5 Things To Think About As Christie Investigates Christie

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

WNYC

At some point this week, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's office is expected to release an internal review of the scandals enveloping his administration, particularly Bridgegate. The report is expected to contain new revelations, but The New York Times said it will conclude that Christie is not culpable for the lane closures. Here's a primer on things to consider when the report is released. 

1) Independence. Christie's lead investigators is Randy Mastro, a former deputy mayor for Rudy Giuliani who has been Christie’s most prominent Bridgegate defender. And one of Mastro's associates is Debra Wong Yang, a close friend of Christie’s who has vacationed with the governor and his family. In 2011, Wong Yang introduced Christie at an event in Manhattan, calling him "as genuine as can be, a salt of the earth person," and "truly the real deal." When Christie took the stage, he described Wong Yang as a "good and dear friend," and recalled how he and his family joined Wong Yang and her three daughters on a vacation at a game ranch in Texas.

To laughs, he described how they chased a wild pig together. 

Wong Yang also got a contract from Christie when he was U.S. Attorney. The Bergen Record reported Monday that one of her daughters interned with Christie. And a few weeks before the Bridgegate scandal became national news, Wong Yang donated $500 to Christie’s inaugural committee.

In other words: Can someone like that really independently investigate Christie? The Republican governor's backers say this legal team can investigate Christie as fairly as Democrats in the Legislature can. The lead legislative investigators, after all, include a former Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor and a former chairman of the state Democratic party.

2) Completeness. Any Bridgegate investigation that doesn’t include interviews with all three key Bridgegate witnesses is, by nature, incomplete. Christie’s lawyers didn’t land any interviews with former Christie deputy chief of staff Bridget Anne Kelly, who wrote the famous "time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee" email, nor former Christie campaign manager Bill Stepien, nor the Port Authority's David Wildstein, who carried out the lane closures. 

The Democrats in the Legislature have also been unable to get these three to talk to them.

3) Purpose. Was Mastro leading a defense team to assist the governor’s office in handing over documents subpoenaed by legislators and federal investigators? Or was he acting as a de facto prosecutor by, for example, seeking to interview the mayors of Hoboken and Fort Lee, who had levied abuse-of-power allegations against Christie?

The details of the final report -- inward looking or prosecutorial against Christie accusers -- will provide the final answer of what the point of all of this was.

4) Media. Someone from Team Christie and/or Team Mastro leaked information about the internal review to The New York Times before the document had been completed or even shown to the governor. The resulting front page article was received very well in the governor’s office – they emailed out excerpts to statehouse reporters on Monday – because it said that the “exhaustive” review had concluded that Christie was innocent. The article also stressed the thoroughness of the review, saying that 70 people had been interviewed and even the governor himself handed over his iPhone.

The timing of the leak indicated that Christie’s press shop was relying on the nation’s most important paper to set a narrative for the internal review in advance of its release. And that narrative is this: The review was extensive and fair, and Christie is not responsible for the lane closures.

5) $1 Million. That’s how much the New York Times says it’s costing taxpayers for Christie to do his internal review. And that’s not all: Taxpayers are also spending money on the Legislature’s lawyers. Couple that with the Port Authority, congressional and U.S. Attorney investigations, and the final tab for that five-day traffic jam in Fort Lee is going to be untold millions.

Tags:

Comments [4]

db from Bend OR

Per Sam P on the Salon blog: So, here's my question: Since Christie used taxpayer money to fund this "independent" "study," wouldn't that mean that the citizens of NJ are the clients of the law firm who conducted the "study"?

If so, then the investigating committee of the legislature as well as the US District Attorney could subpoena all documents and correspondence related to that "study" and the Christie administration wouldn't be able to claim attorney/client privilege, right?

If this is supposed to be an independent review, and the law firm retained was NOT hired to defend Christie against possible legal action, wouldn't it make sense for the legislative committee and the USAD to subpoena everything in the law firm's possession regarding this today?

Yeah, I know how flawed this so-called "independent" review is. That's not the point. If, as I and others suspect, the Christie administration may have had a hand in crafting this report, that needs to be brought to light -- especially since NJ taxpayers have paid +$1 million for this."

Mar. 25 2014 12:31 PM
Raul from Brooklyn

Is this another example of the coverup being worse than the crime? Spending $1 Million of taxpayer money to pay for Christie's political coverup seems immoral, whether or not it's legal.

Mar. 25 2014 10:55 AM
Sal Roselli from Lindenwold

All of the Kool Aid drinkers from the Christie well will all tout this report as clearing the "king" the "bully". This report is a joke and a disgrace that the taxpayers of this state are on the hook paying for the "bully's" defense lawyer to do an investigation. I cannot believe that the Times can be manipulated so easily where is your credibility??? If you believe a word of this report I have some land in Florida to sell you. Also don't you think the king of trenton has another cell phone other than the one that was "scrubbed?" Come on now if Bridgette Kelly had another cell phone don't you think big boy had one????

Mar. 25 2014 08:34 AM
Sal Roselli from Lindenwold

All of the Kool Aid drinkers from the Christie well will all tout this report as clearing the "king" the "bully". This report is a joke and a disgrace that the taxpayers of this state are on the hook paying for the "bully's" defense lawyer to do an investigation. I cannot believe that the Times can be manipulated so easily where is your credibility??? If you believe a word of this report I have some land in Florida to sell you. Also don't you think the king of trenton has another cell phone other than the one that was "scrubbed?" Come on now if Bridgette Kelly had another cell phone don't you think big boy had one????

Mar. 25 2014 08:34 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored