Spitzer and Stringer Face Off

Thursday, August 22, 2013


The two Democratic candidates hoping to become the city's next comptroller picked at each other as they outlined their visions during a debate aired on CBS television and radio on Thursday night.

Both Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer and former Gov. Eliot Spitzer agreed that the way to save money for the city is to reduce some $400 million in fees paid to money managers.

But that's where the agreement ended.

"The role of comptroller is a job of public trust," said Stringer. He questioned how Spitzer, resigned from office amid a prostitution scandal in 2008, could earn the trust of voters.

"I've made mistakes but I've made a difference," said Spitzer, defending his record as governor, and as attorney general.

Spitzer, in turn, criticized Stringer for supporting the rezoning of Midtown Manhattan. "It was a cave to developers," said Spitzer.

"I must have missed Eliot at the community [development] meetings," Stringer shot back.

Polls show Spitzer has about a 19 percent lead over Stringer.  

The primary is September 10th.

 Spitzer resigned from office amid a prostitution scandal in 2008. When asked if he would legalize prostitution, he said no. Polls show he has about a 19 percent lead over Stringer.




More in:

Comments [2]


Agree with the above post. Trust is such a rarity in public officials....and Eliot Spitzer is certainly not trustworthy. And he did try to choke the prostitutes. Scum

Aug. 23 2013 11:08 PM

Scott Stringer is right. We must have trust in our public officials. But there is no way anyone can trust Eliot Spitzer. Not only did Spitzer hire prostitutes, he endangered their lives. He tried to CHOKE them during his kinky escapades!

Aug. 23 2013 04:30 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by