Photo credit: @julesdwit.
A not-for-profit media organization supported by people like you.
there IS something terribly disingenuous about the "poor homosexuals want to be able to be married too". this is a political agenda for exactly what purpose is unclear but does it need the poetic waxing about love? why do I say this? am not sure I can put my finger on it exactly but the divorce rate in this country is one thing... secondly, if the issue is about being able to get one half of the deceased's social security check, or about hospital visitation rights, then it's not about "being allowed to marry someone you love." You don't need a wedding to change the applicable regulations. That married couples get taxed at a higher rate than singles also brings this whining about love and marriage for the sake of legal rights into question. The "rights" that a legal marriage protects are those of children and historically of the divorced woman who was left destitute if she had not originally come from a family "of substance". As for needing to be married in order to express fidelity, I would say that concepts of contracts and fidelity are the most conservative and traditional forms of human social organization - it is too ironic that on the one hand, you have the tide of postmodern cultural rejection of traditional sexual morality, a tide that can not be stemmed, and on the other hand, groups that reject traditional laws and values are whining and demanding that such traditional laws be applied to them. It makes no sense. Unless of course there are very real financial benefits - I can see arguing for that. Chances are great that "your marriage" will end in divorce before then, largely thanks to the influence of revolution.
Was expecting your rail against the mention of the civil marriage debate and I say this: This is the political football du jour. It will be in the news, get over it. Pro or con, many people are sick of hearing about Israel, or abortion, or immigrants, or domestic workers, or whatever else comes up. Regardless, decisions on these issues are important to many and to have real repercussions for those whom they affect. So just deal with it and move on.
You wrote: “They’re upset about the way latinos are treated? How can I ever trust a Hispanic politician after this?!”Though I don’t agree with the tone of your comment, but it highlights an important issue. Montserrat, Espada, and Diaz have pushed for greater representation and leadership positions for Hispanics in New York state, however, the push has be bathed in shades of racism (against blacks) and homophobia.In a country with significant “go back where you came from” and “speak English” sentiments towards Spanish speaking peoples, to see blatant bigotry while admonishing those with prejudiced Spanish speakers is the height of hypocrisy. If anything, this will set back Spanish speaking people or even native-born people with Spanish sounding names because it will be associated with groups trying to change American culture and society without respect to other Americans or American ideals (as in the case of Diaz letting his brand of religion be his political guide.)
Can you please look into the Espada burglary?
1) He reported on the senate floor that his home was broken into.2) It was not his district home, but rather his Mamaroneck home.3) No valuables were stolen.4) Paperwork/records were stolen.
(From NYT: "Investigators could be somewhat hampered by a burglary that Mr. Espada has said took place last week at his Mamaroneck home. The burglars took files and records, but no valuables, he has said.")
How is this a credible story? If he is keeping important records in Mamaroneck, does that imply that that's his primary home? More importantly, would burglars *really* steal files and not valuables? Doesn't it have to be either his own coverup or someone else's dirty trick?
Can you help your community of the air to understand this better?
Brian, how much is the homosexual lobby paying you to use your program as their mouthpiece?
Joe Bruno changing to support homsexual marriage. Big story, huh? A joke, like Tom Suozzi's shift in the NY Times the other day. A few Italian Catholic politicians have lost their backbone, succumbing to the homosexual propaganda and lobby. Big deal. Joe Bruno is in trouble with the law. Suozzi has big political ambitions. So they are converting to the homosexual cause. Doesn't reflect well on them when they shift to the flavor of the day and show no backbone.
Leo, I am not sure what will happen in our district, but hopefully, if justice is real in this city, Hiram will be in Rikers or Attica sometime later this year. Then he automatically loses his seat. (But the NYPD will still have to pay his pension!!!)
He is a psycho, but he knows how to play the game.
They're upset about the way latinos are treated? How can I ever trust a Hispanic politician after this?!
Jeff #4 - I'm glad I'm not the only person complaining about our "senator". Do you know if there is a possibility of a recall and if there are any independent civic organizations in our district organizing to force him to resign or at least to present a legitimate candidate 4 years from now?
This guy has hit the nail on the head. Bravo!!! Cesspool would be an improvement.
Brian, I love Shakespeare, so please stop calling Monserrate "the Hamlet of Jackson Heights."
That not only insults Shakespeare, and poor Hamlet, but also our neighborhood.
I am proud to have this self-professed psycho as my state senator.
Remember the kids in high school who were in student council or any school government? Yeah, they were creepy, huh? These are the same kids -- older with a lot more psychic baggage.
Hiram Monster-rat, my state senator (and I choke as I type that) is trying to prove he is insane. Golisano promised him another pension for a psychological disability, and the big fool believed him.
At one point in this farce will the "Honorable" Pedro Espada realize the laughing stock he has become?
Why is it that politicians all over the world, from Iraq to Albany, are almost entirely a bunch of a-holes? What is it about being a politician that attracts the worst characters of every nation?
Brian, Can you ask your guests if there has been ANY reporter/journalist in NY covering this circus the following direct question to either Espada or Monserrat: How much money did you receive or were offered by Boss Golisano?
Email addresses are required but never displayed.
Brian Lehrer leads the conversation about what matters most now in local and national politics, our own communities and our lives.
Subscribe on iTunes
Brian Lehrer Weekend: Mad Men's Matt Weiner, Ira Glass & Sarah Koenig, '04 Food
WNYC 93.9 FM and AM 820 are New York's flagship public radio
stations, broadcasting the finest programs from NPR and PRI, as well as a wide range of award-winning local
programming. WNYC is a division of
New York Public Radio.