'Profound Questions About Privacy' Follow Latest Revelations

Friday, June 07, 2013

Fresh reports about the massive amount of electronic data that the nation's spy agencies are collecting "raise profound questions about privacy" because of what they say about how such information will be collected in the future, NPR's Dina Temple-Raston said Friday on Morning Edition.

And Glenn Greenwald, the activist/blogger/journalist who has been breaking stories this week in The Guardian about what the National Security Agency, FBI and other agencies are doing, said on Morning Edition that he believes the National Security Agency hopes to create a "worldwide surveillance net that allows it to monitor what all human beings are doing."

Meanwhile, as we reported Thursday night, the Obama administration's director of national intelligence says the intelligence agencies work "within the constraints of the law to collect, analyze and understand information related to potential threats to our national security." In a statement, James Clapper added that "the intelligence community is committed to respecting the civil liberties and privacy of all American citizens."

Obama administration officials and lawmakers on Capitol Hill have said the intelligence community's focus is on the electronic communications of non-U.S. citizens.

Those are among Friday morning's follow-ups to these two stories:

-- NSA Reportedly Mines Servers Of U.S. Internet Firms For Data.

-- Spy Agency's Collection Of Phone Records Reopens Controversy.

On the news of the NSA's collection of data from the data servers of Microsoft, Google, Apple and other leading U.S. tech companies:

-- The companies, as we reported last night, have issued statements saying they have not given the government direct access to their servers, but that they do comply with legally binding orders to provide some information about customers' activities.

-- NPR's Dina Temple-Raston said Friday that this is "an early glimpse of how intelligence is going to be collected in the future." What the spy agencies appear to be doing, she said, is gathering up such data and hanging on to it "in anticipation that it might be useful someday."

According to The Washington Post, which along with the Guardian broke the news about the collection of data from tech companies, "the National Security Agency and the FBI are tapping directly into the central servers of nine leading U.S. Internet companies, extracting audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails, documents, and connection logs that enable analysts to track foreign targets."

As law enforcement agencies learn to take those reams of information and search them "to find patterns that [they] might otherwise have missed ... it's going to raise profound questions about privacy," Dina told Morning Edition guest host Linda Wertheimer.

Also on Morning Edition:

-- The History Behind America's Most Secretive Court.

Update at 11:55 a.m. ET. British Security Agency Reportedly Also Gathering Information.

The Guardian writes that:

"The U.K.'s electronic eavesdropping and security agency, GCHQ, has been secretly gathering intelligence from the world's biggest Internet companies through a covertly run operation set up by America's top spy agency, documents obtained by the Guardian reveal.

"The documents show that GCHQ, based in Cheltenham, has had access to the system since at least June 2010, and generated 197 intelligence reports from it last year."

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit

Source: NPR


More in:

Comments [3]

Dave from Times Square

Noice try to have a former DoJ opfficial Carrie F. Cordero to spin things, what a liar!

Jun. 12 2013 07:14 AM
Valerie from Brooklyn

I wonder how many storage floors are built or planned below ground at the Nevada data storage site. How much bigger is it than what is shown in the arial photographs?

Jun. 10 2013 11:15 AM
RJ from prospect hts

I wouldn't dream of defending the president's surveillance program, but Ms. Eddings seems to have a short memory. In response to his saying that 5 or 6 years ago we would not be having a debate about this, she said, of course, we only learned about this last week. Doesn't she (and he, for that matter) recall the vociferous response to President Bush's warrantless wiretap program??? Perhaps that noise would not have been considered a "debate," but little over the past 15-20 years could be characterized as such--and I don't expect the noise ensuing now and to come will be any different.

Jun. 07 2013 05:06 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by