Second Trans-Hudson Tunnel Gets Some Real Money

Thursday, May 30, 2013 - 12:07 PM

The rail yards on Manhattan's far west side -- home to the Hudson Yards development project (Kate Hinds)

Since the ARC NJ Transit tunnel under the Hudson River was killed over two years ago, planners have been lighting a feeble flame under the hope of a second "Gateway" tunnel, for Amtrak trains.  Now, that flame is getting some serious fuel, in the form of $185 million cash infusion from post-Sandy aid.

The $185 million will be used to build an 800-foot concrete encasement between 10th and 11th Avenues to preserve the tunnel right-of-way while Manhattan's massive Hudson Yards development project rises.  A full tunnel is decades away.

The funds come from the Sandy package, officials say, because the storm showed the vulnerability of Hudson crossings.

"The tunnels are over 100 years old, and they're decrepit," said Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY). "We can't exist without these tunnels and yet they're in bad shape. Oh, and by the way, they're totally overused."

U.S. DOT secretary Ray LaHood, Amtrak chair Tony Coscia, and Senator Charles Schumer (photo by Kate Hinds)

Schumer said Sandy highlighted a flaw in the region's transportation infrastructure: the need for new, flood-resistant trans-Hudson tunnels. "We all know what happened on October 30th," he said. "Sandy ravaged our infrastructure, including the tunnels that go under the Hudson River."

During Sandy, the existing Hudson River tunnels were flooded with 3.25 million gallons of brackish water, disrupting service on New Jersey Transit and Amtrak for days.

Schumer was joined at Thursday's funding announcement by the outgoing transportation secretary Ray LaHood, as well at Amtrak chairman Tony Coscia.

Ray LaHood said Schumer had been "tenacious" in getting his attention for transportation funding in New York. "I'm on his speed dial," LaHood said.

A rendering of the Gateway project (photo by Kate Hinds)

So far the Gateway project has only gotten bits of aid, mostly for studies and the kinds of preliminary funding that doesn't necessarily indicate a project will be built. ("We have $120 million in this year's budget that the president put in, and I'm protecting, to do the planning and engineering and design work for these tunnels right now, said Schumer.) Thursday's grant changes that equation.

A second tunnel -- known clumsily as the ARC, or Access to the Region's Core -- had been under construction, but NJ Governor Chris Christie pulled the plug on that in 2010, saying the project was headed for cost overruns that were too risky for New Jersey taxpayers.

"This is a substitute for the ARC tunnel," said Schumer, who added that he and NJ Senator Frank Lautenberg "felt very badly when it didn't go through. But because this is going to be much more just federal money -- not state money, not Port Authority money -- Governor Christie has been supportive of this proposal."

Another rendering of the project (photo by Kate Hinds)

The west side of New York has long been a regional rail bottleneck, and Gateway as planned would more than double trans-Hudson rail capacity -- as well as provide critical redundancy. But it could cost upwards of $13 billion, and so far that funding hasn't been identified. Nor is there a timetable for construction -- two questions that dogged the officials at Thursday's press conference.

"There are a lot of ifs," said Schumer. "Can we get $13 billion in two years? What if we get $3 billion?"

LaHood interjected "Lookit. There's no number right now. There's no number."

"Here's my goal," said Schumer -- only to be cut off again by LaHood. "The answer is there's no number right now!" said LaHood, sounding exasperated. "This is like building the interstate system. You build part of it, you get the money, then you build the next part. The answer is there's no number right now!"

"Once we get the box tunnel done, we will start scouring the federal government for dollars," said Schumer. "I'm optimistic we can do that. This is the kind of thing that has broad support."


Comments [3]

Ralph Braskett from NJ

The region should pay for highly useful #7 connection from Times Square to
Secaucus transfer station via Lincoln Harbor. That approach would benefit all NJT riders with East Side destinations and ALL Bergen cty. bus riders, who could transfer to #7 at Lincoln Harbor along with HBLRT riders from Hudson cty. This would also help Reverse NYC Commuters from Uptown, Bronx & Queens, whose jobs were moved to the NJ Gold Coast.
See for details.

Jun. 03 2013 08:51 AM
chris from Teaneck, NJ

Look, you have to hand it to Christie for holding all the NJ transit rail passenger hostage. He gets to look good and he gets a possible a better deal for NJ. NYC, NYS, MTA and the Feds all want the project. The losers are a diversity group from all over the region. They are NJ construction workers and civil engineers. They are the rail and bus passengers who stand during the trip into and out of NYC. They are people stuck in cars and Amtrak passengers from outside the region.

But what is left unsaid, is that he does not think NJ state department of transit is capable of managing the ARC project nor do they have the skill to control project costs. Instead what he is doing is outsourcing the control to the Feds and MTA. The downside is that many of the jobs which might created in NJ will instead go to NY, the MTA and the federal government.

Long term, what is needed is a regional transportation authority. NJ transit should be run by the MTA. They did a pretty good job during Sandy. If we had a regional transportation authority during the 60s or 70s, we would had the 3 train tunnels across the Hudson (1 freight to long island), 7 train service to Secaucus, a new PATH, and ideally a subway/rail loop around the whole region from JFK to Bronx to NNJ and Jersey City/Newark airport.

Jun. 01 2013 11:01 AM

First sentence should read "Since the ARC NJ Transit tunnel under the Hudson River was killed over two years ago, by Gov. Christie"

May. 30 2013 03:41 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.