Streams

Brooklyn Bike Lane Case: All Subpoenas Withdrawn

Wednesday, August 03, 2011 - 02:29 PM

The Prospect Park West bike lane in Brooklyn (photo by Kate Hinds)

All subpoenas in the lawsuit against Brooklyn's Prospect Park West bike lane have been withdrawn, and the lawsuit is now awaiting judicial action.   No new court dates have been set.

Justice Bert Bunyan could issue a ruling on discovery -- or on the Article 78 merits of the case -- at any time.

That was the outcome of a court hearing in Brooklyn State Supreme Court Wednesday, which focused on the subpoenas Neighbors for Better Bike Lanes/Seniors for Safety attorney Jim Walden had issued to officials including NYC Department of Transportation head Janette Sadik-Khan and New York City Council member Brad Lander.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim the city manipulated data and didn't seek adequate community input before install the 2-way protected bike lane along a 1.1-mile stretch of roadway along Brooklyn's Prospect Park.

But the city notes  the local community board requested the lane, repeatedly approved it, and says the bike lane is  a proven success.  The city says automobile speeding has dwindled dramatically,  and that bike riding on the sidewalk has diminished to almost nothing.

Last week the city requested a temporary restraining to block subpoenas to "non-parties" in the case -- including Community Board 6 District Manager Craig Hammerman and Transportation Alternatives chief Paul Steely White. Walden withdrew those subpoenas last week.

After today's hearing, Walden withdrew all the other ones, and agreed not to issue any further subpoenas without judicial approval.

Karen Selvin, assistant corporation counsel with the NYC Law Department, said in an emailed statement: "We are pleased with today's developments, which will go a long way toward ending the harassing theater that has surrounded this case. We look forward to the judge's decision and are confident that we will prevail on this important New York City project."

For his part, Jim Walden said that he agreed to go back to the judge before issuing any subpoenas as a show of good faith. "Obviously, we're always going to accommodate a request from the court." But Walden said he believed that the judge will ultimately grant discovery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags:

Comments [3]

Kate Hinds

I swapped it out for an official, attributable quote!

Aug. 03 2011 04:47 PM
steve

What happened to the quote you had earlier?

"Discovery is solely within discretion of the judge and it was improper for Mr. Walden to issue subpoenas to people..."

Aug. 03 2011 04:26 PM
So Ready for This to Be Over

Jim Walden should be disbarred once this is done.

Aug. 03 2011 02:42 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored