Award–winning journalist Andrea Bernstein is Senior Editor for Politics & Policy for WNYC News. She has previously served as Metro Editor, Political Director, Director of Transportation Nation, and Senior Reporter.
(Jackie Yamanaka, Yellowstone Public Radio) Where you stand depends on where you sit. And so Republican Senator John Barrasso says he's concerned with the share urban projects will get in the next federal transportation bill -- even though the state has long benefited from federal highway formulas per Wyomingite.
The White House's "Sustainable Communities" initiative has caught Barrasso's eye, and his ire. Barrasso says the affordable housing and transit program favors larger metropolitan regions areas over places like his spread-out home state. "People in rural communities are paying for the big cities' mass transit, instead of just for our roads," he tells Yellowstone Public Radio.
The story, here. Transcript after the jump.
But as Pro Publica and others have reported, Wyoming was given $1,519 per capita in Stimulus funding, and historically has done well in federal highway funding, because formulas favor "states with lots of roads and few people."
Barrasso: "I want to make sure we continue to keep the focus on these issue affecting rural America. We're always looking to see how money is moved to the big cities, especially when that comes at the expense of the states of Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, the Rocky Mountain West. We are very quick to jump on that and say 'wait a second this isn't fair we want to make sure our communities are taken care of...We know that gasoline taxes go for more than just highways, and people in rural communities are paying for the big cities mass transit, instead of just for our roads."