Killed While Cycling: Why So Few Fatal Bike Crashes Lead to Arrest in NYC

Sunday, April 08, 2012 - 09:00 PM

A "bike lift" in silence during a memorial ride for killed cylists, March 2012 (Photo by Alex Goldmark)

Last year, 21 cyclists died in vehicle crashes in New York City.  But only two drivers were arrested and local district attorneys are hard pressed to cite convictions for cyclist deaths.  Instead, they say, cyclists and their advocates don't understand how tough it is to call a traffic crash a crime.

As far as intersections go, Bowery and Delancey is a pretty big one, eight lanes cross six. It’s never really empty, not even at 1:30 in the morning. It was that time of night about four years ago when Rasha Shamoon was fatally struck there by a Range Rover while riding her bike home.

As is standard procedure in traffic deaths in New York City, the police arrived and treated the intersection as a crime scene. They interviewed the three people in the car, but no other witnesses were mentioned in the police report -- several people had called 911 from the scene, but we'll never know if they saw the crash or not. Police determined Rasha Shamoon caused the crash and let the driver go.

Rasha's mother didn't buy the story. Samira Shamoon would later tell a New York city council hearing: “The first police report to the newspaper claimed that Rasha was at fault because she had  run the red light and she was not wearing a helmet.” No helmet was found at the scene, but Rasha was known as obsessive on safety issues.

“Even the statement they got from the driver and his friends were not accurate and complete,” Samira Shamoon lamented. To get more information, she took the driver to civil court.

“We didn’t have any eye witnesses that said he was speeding," says Shamoon's lawyer, Adam White.  "We didn’t have an accident re-constructionist, nothing in the police report that indicated rate of speed.” White used circumstantial evidence: Rasha's whole bike was covered in reflective tape, the passengers gave partially-conflicting accounts, and the 21 year-old driver had at least six previous moving violations.

"Ultimately the jury found that the driver was 95 percent at fault and it put 5 percent of fault on Rasha,” White said of the verdict handed down in February. The Shamoons were awarded $200,000.

The year Rasha Shamoon was hit, 2008, was the worst since 2000 for cyclist deaths: 26 people died. Last year, it was 21. But there were 27 times when a cyclist died, or was thought likely to die in NYC—that's how police categorize cases for record keeping. The NYPD tells WNYC of those 27 cases, two drivers were arrested. Looking at all cases where a driver kills someone -- pedestrian, cyclist, other motorists, themselves -- forty percent of the time, there’s not even a traffic ticket. Explaining why not, gets complicated.

Cyclist deaths in 2011 -- locations and dates from NYC DOT.

Bike advocates like Caroline Samponaro of Transportation Alternatives want the police to get tougher. If drivers cause crashes that kill, she told me, they should face serious consequences. “Even if you can’t prevent that crash, you can follow up and make sure that another crash like it doesn’t ever happen."

As cycling has taken hold in New York, and cases like Rasha Shamoon’s make their rounds on the bike blogs, something of a furor has risen up in the cycling community. Samponaro’s group organized protests outside police headquarters in November after another killed cyclist's family started criticizing the NYPD investigation.

Artist Mathieu Lefevre was hit by a truck in October in Williamsburg. The driver told police he did not know he hit anyone, so continued driving a few blocks before parking. No charges were filed because police determined both parties were at fault.

Erika Lefevre, Mathieu's mother, pressed for more investigation, and publicly complained the police withheld information from her, eventually filing a freedom of information request to see what the investigation report had found.

There were no photos from the scene because the police camera broke, according to the police report. And the only surveillance video from the scene doesn't show the crash.

I called the truck driver several times. When he didn’t return my calls, I went to his house to try to get his side of the story, but all he said was “no comment.”

As for the police, they say they're just following the law.

Sparked largely by the Lefevre case, the City Council held a four-hour hearing on traffic safety in February. “We realize that these are not just numbers on a piece of paper," NYPD Deputy Chief John Cassidy told angry council members and victims' family members. "And in my opening statement when I said one fatality is one too many, I seriously believe that,” he added.

The morning turned into a lesson in organizational charts, patrol guides and traffic law. The NYPD's most involved traffic investigations are handled by the Accident Investigation Squad. In 2000, there were 24 detectives. Now, because of budget cuts, there are 19. They handle the whole city.

So those detectives can only show up when someone dies or is declared likely to die by a medical professional. Asking them to handle more cases, or adding more detectives would be a policy choice, Cassidy said. “It would take resources away from other enforcement initiatives. One person can’t do two separate jobs at the same time.”

Those other initiatives include speed traps and DUI checkpoints. And, as Cassidy pointed out, traffic deaths are at an all time low. "So the accidents that you speak of," he told the council, "are not in fact occurring. So it’s not that we’re not doing anything out there. I think it’s quite the contrary -- we’re doing a lot with [a] lot less.”

I asked the police to explain how they determine when to make arrests, when to issue a ticket, and when to just let the driver go in a fatal crash with a cyclist. In an email, they said a motorist needs to break two traffic laws to rise to the level of criminal.

“Speeding alone will not produce criminality” the statement reads. “Passing a stop sign only will not provide for criminal charges. They will result in a speeding summons and a stop sign summons only, but together we have established a criminal charge of Criminally Negligent Homicide or higher.”

You'd need both to slap cuffs on a driver. And the police would need to witness speeding to prove it in most cases, they point out.

“We as a society have chosen to drive these  big cars," said Joe McCormack, Assistant District Attorney for the Bronx. It’s his job to prosecute traffic crimes. "And we also as a society have chosen not to criminalize every single small mistake that just has a dramatic consequence because you're driving a car,” he said.

I asked all five district attorneys for an accounting of how many times someone who killed a cyclist was convicted of a crime. They all said they don’t track cases that way. But after much prodding for examples of what types of cases lead to jail time, the Queens DA cited two cases. In a 2009 case, a driver who had just sold heroin to an undercover officer was fleeing the scene when he struck and killed a cyclist. He was sentenced to seven-and-a-half to 15 years. In a 2006 drunk driving case, the motorist was sentenced to two-and-a-half to five years.

The Manhattan D.A. pointed to the case of Marilyn Dershowitz, sister-in-law of prominent lawyer Alan Dershowitz. The driver has been indicted. The case is pending.

The Brooklyn D.A. has brought three cases where bicyclists died in the past two years. All got convictions. Two were prosecuted as aggravated unlicensed driving charges. The third death case was tried as a manslaughter but ended with a jury trial conviction of driving with a suspended license.

Only one cyclist died in the Bronx last year. It was a hit and run. The driver was never found.

“There are times where the factual situation that is presented to us doesn’t rise to a crime," McCormack said. "And it’s important to realize that the reason it doesn’t rise to a crime is that society has made that decision that it doesn’t want it to be a crime.”

Some in society do.

When the weather warmed last month, a couple hundred cyclists held a memorial ride to honor the 21 bike riders who were killed on city streets last year. They placed white painted ghost bikes at the site of each crash. Read a statement in front of the 90th Precinct where four cyclists were killed last year, including Lefevre. And rang their bike bells the the backdrop of a bagpipe.

Those 21 deaths, they say, are 21 too many.  On that, the police agree.

Audio of protest used with permission from Streetfilms. In addition to our map above, cyclist deaths from other years are tracked and mapped at


Comments [6]

Brian from NJ

As a safe cyclist who obeys the traffic laws (to forestall the nonsense from some who see all cyclists as hooligans)I have had police do nothing when I am hit by cars, run off the road, or even have someone break a bottle on my head. I was once knocked off my bike by a foriegner with no US license driving someone else's car with a cracked windshield -- cops did nothing (even when they later found out she gave them a bogus name and expired address before drivign away!) I used to think the do-nothing attitude of local cops here in NJ was due to some animosity towards cyclists. After all, the only other people I ever knew who had the same problems were cyclists.

Then one of my parents was run down from behind by a car driver who broke her leg, while walking on foot. Three women in the car and no one saw anything. Again, not even a ticket.

I have to conclude that while some of this lax attitude may indeed be due to an animosity to or tendency to blame cyclists, some is simply a tendency to make excuses for people in cars. As if they have some right to drive. This HAS to STOP.

Let's get something straight; cyclists are the only vehicle operators who have a legal right to use the road. For motorized vehicles it's a priveledge, granted by the gov't -- and one that should be revoked more often. We have 30,000-40,000 people killed every year in preventable car wrecks -- and that's just car drivers dead. Factor in bikers, peds, etc.. gets worse. Just to put it in perspective, the current figure, upper 30,000, works out to roughly 100 people killer per day.

If the Assistant DA quoted in his article thinks a hundred manslaughters a day are socially acceptable -- or, as he said, "society has made that decision that it doesn’t want it to be a crime" -- he needs to be fired and they need to hire someone who gives a darn. Society is a lousy mental abstraction. The 100 dead people every day are real, and despite what some bike-bashers say about reckless cyclists, most of them were probably getting along just fine in safety before a car ran em over.

The bloodshed will continue until our politicians and policemen are no longer content to look the other way while we are left on the street to die, a gruesome offering to the inane and immature concept that someone has a god-given right to be reckless inside a fifteen hundred pound machine powered by a series of small controlled explosions.

Feb. 01 2015 08:21 PM
Robert Wright

I'm interested that people still seem to be looking at this story. It clearly touched a nerve. Since I last commented, I've put up a blogpost about the root of some of the anti-cyclist prejudices at work in the comments above. It's here:

Dec. 20 2012 10:19 AM
Robert Wright

David Morgan, I think people should follow the road rules, as I do when cycling. The fact remains that it's March 2009 since a cyclist killed anyone in New York City. In the year to June, motor vehicle crashes killed 291 people - pedestrians, cyclists and car occupants in the city. You might think cyclists are the danger on sidewalks but the facts suggest you're wrong. There are, tragically, regular deaths of pedestrians hit on sidewalks by out-of-control cars. I blogged on the rational approach to road safety in New York here:

Oct. 12 2012 11:12 AM
David Morgan

In NYC the behavior of people riding bikes is reprehensible. They ride on the side walks, go through red lights, travel the wrong way on one-way streets and are constantly putting pedestrians at risk of being struck by a wayward bike. They simply refuse to obey the traffic laws in the way that pedestrians and cars must do.

Sep. 25 2012 07:07 AM
Invisible Visible Man

I blogged a couple of weeks ago on police attitudes in both the UK and US to cyclist fatalities. The post is at:

Jun. 20 2012 01:22 PM

The only reasonable solution: more privately funded video cameras at all dangerous intersections where there are clusters of accidents, at different angles to get the best video captures. It would eliminate the "he said she said" mentality. I would suggest using battery packs powered with solar rechargers to extend life in waterproof housings(you might want to disgise them to prevent theft). With flash memory and hi res cameras getting so cheap, you could get 24 hours of high resolution video, no problem. What's more, its PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of wrongdoing, which would compel authorities to act regardless of their prejudices. Forget the whole "Big Brother is watching" crap. The days of anonymous living are over anyway. At least this invasion of privacy could save lives by forcing the police to get dangerous drivers off the road.

Apr. 21 2012 02:13 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.