SFpark Makes its First Move

Thursday, July 14, 2011 - 10:21 AM

(San Francisco – KALW) San Francisco’s ambitious parking program will meet its first test later this month, when the city adjusts rates at meters in eight busy neighborhoods to try and better match supply and demand. The program, called SFpark, uses data from sensors embedded in the pavement to track parking demand in real time at meters around the city, and prices each block accordingly: meters in more congested areas are more expensive, while those on emptier streets are cheaper. City staff will make the first price adjustment later this month, based on data collected since the program’s official launch this past spring. The verdict? Prices at about one third of meters will go up by 25 cents to a high of $3.75/hr; another third will drop by 25-50 cents, to as low as $1.75/hr. The final third will remain the same, as will rates at city-owned garages.

SFpark manager Jay Primus said that while the preliminary data is fascinating, the really useful information will come out later this summer, when the city makes its second price adjustment.

“It will be interesting to see how much parking demand has redistributed” in the wake of the first change, he said.

Much of the preliminary data reflects conventional wisdom about parking in San Francisco: it’s tricky to find a space during the week in the Financial District; easier to do so weekend mornings in SoMa. But some of the results seem utterly mystifying. For example, the 200 block of Hayes Street, in the Civic Center neighborhood, often has less than a quarter of its spots filled, while the 300 block is often more than 80% full. As a result, parking costs on the 200 block will drop by as much as 50 cents an hour; on the 300 block they’ll either stay the same or increase by 25 cents, depending on the time of day.

“It is curious,” said Primus of those kinds of areas. “But San Francisco is an incredibly complex and rich city whose subtleties vary from block to block. And we all experience that walking around from day to day.” Any number of things could affect parking demand, he said; the goal of SFpark is to be able to adapt. “Let’s say a new restaurant opens up on a particular block,” he said. “We’ll be able to keep up with that as neighborhoods or blocks change or evolve and grow.”

The program’s goal is to have at least one free space on every block, thus dramatically reducing the need for drivers to circle or double-park. At the same time, it strives for 80% parking occupancy, the idea being that cars should be distributed more or less evenly across the available spots. “We only need a couple people to change their behavior to decide to park on the next block, to create the right level of availability,” said Primus.

Pore over the data yourself, and check out maps showing where prices will change, over at SFpark.


Comments [1]


SF Park is an EPIC FAILURE! I live in a pilot area SOMA where SF Park installed meters. The end result is that the residents in my neighborhood can no longer park near our homes, apartments, and businesses. This is absolutely a none too transparent attempt to raise taxes on citiizens expected to support over EIGHT THOUSAND City employees making over $150,000 a year under the guise of "going green."

The EPIC FAILURE is that **NO ONE IS PARKING AT THE METERS** along the Caltrain line Near Townsend and 6th street. Residents on Bluxome Street now have to park our cars up to 4 blocks away from our homes or pay $2.00 - $3.00 an hour to park at the meters to bring in groceries or off load our children. Is it any wonder why families have given up on San Francisco?

It is a huge inconvenience to the businesses and residents in my neighborhood and its made SOMA a less desirable place to rent, own real estate, or operate a business. The residents see this as a money grab by the SFMTA who rammed these meters through without regard for the needs or input of our neighborhood. The city takes away street parking from hardworking residents so that the SFMTA can build websites and useless smartphone apps that require a $100.00 a month cell phone plan. *This is class warfare that favors the wealthiest residents of the city and penalizes poorer, working class citizens who have less money and education. SF Park states that that they use "innovative technology and advanced pricing strategies". I say that residents should not have to own a smart phone, or be digitally literate in order to park their cars. If you are elderly, disabled, or on a fixed income, you will be forced to take MUNI to get around the city.

The MTA is basically auctioning off the parking parking spaces so that the highest payer wins! This de facto tax threatens to price middle income residents out of our neighborhoods and DECIMATE small businesses. More than 1 in 3 of San Francisco's nearly 27,000 city workers earned $100,000 or more last year. The revenue from these new meters will only benefit the pockets, and pension plans of city employees.

Residents in other parts of the city should fight this fascism and not allow these meters to be installed. Jay Primus, and the Government officials who implemented this poorly run project should be ousted from their six figure, App writing, Ivory Towers.

Feb. 29 2012 01:27 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.