Streams

Fares and Tolls Rise in New M.T.A. Plan

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Assemblyman (D-86th District) Richard Brodsky discusses a proposal by the M.T.A to raise fares and tolls for next year to offset a budget gap of $900 million.

Guests:

Richard Brodsky

Comments [10]

BL Producer from WNYC Studios

[[A couple comments have been removed for violating the WNYC posting policy - please keep comments relevant to the discussion on the air. If you would like to submit a story idea, we would love to hear it. All the information you need is here:

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/bl/youproduce.html

Thanks for listening,
-BL Show-]]

Jul. 22 2008 12:07 PM
Voter from Brooklyn

And as others have mentioned, I'm all for funding the MTA (and Amtrak on the national level) but with that funding comes oversight.

Jul. 22 2008 12:02 PM
Voter from Brooklyn

I agree with #4. Maybe what the MTA needs is a very public and very deep and thorough audit. If they truly need the money, so be it, but the City deserves to see where every dime goes… from electricity for the track to paperclips on interoffice memos.

Jul. 22 2008 11:59 AM
Nicole from Manhattan

The subway is a New York City utility. Its accessibility and efficiency should be considered just as important as Con Ed. Government money should go to the subway FIRST.

I think we should stage a passenger strike: One day when all riders boycott the MTA.

Those of us who depend on the subway cannot bear the burden of a fare hike.

Jul. 22 2008 11:58 AM
Christopher Deignan from Middle Village, Queens

Great guest and great point that the folks who benefit from the transport infrastructure are not just those who use it. Just how short-sighted can all these lawmakers in Albany be not to see the advantages of investing in the system? There are so many benefits to people not using their cars in such a densely populated city.

Oh, side issue pet peeve, safe places for people to park their bicyles, there is a serious shortage of same.

Jul. 22 2008 11:57 AM
Alice from Westchester

Richard,

Won't the budget gap be filled with the increase in ridership since gas prices have gone berserk?

Jul. 22 2008 11:52 AM
exlege from brooklyn

how about a NYC "access zone" real estate charge for companies residing in zones that have close access to rapid transit?

Jul. 22 2008 11:52 AM
Lexington Line from downtown

Three comments/questions:
(1)How come the transitchek card is limited to two transactions per day? When I called the MTA about this I was told that the machines at Grand Central Terminal allowed multiple transactions/purchases per day....why not all the stations...all the machines? It is very inconvenient and rather arbitrary.

(2) How can the MTA be such horrible managers of their budgets? One year they have double bookkeeping, a surplus is revealed, now they are in dept? When was the last time this quasi-public agency underwent a public audit?

(3)The information lines are *still* very poor. Offering call back service within one business day doesn't help the rider standing at the bus stop. Also, there should be a central number to call in compliments and complaints regarding MTA personnel. When will the contact numbers be updated?

Jul. 22 2008 11:36 AM
Donovan from Brooklyn

A few years back on WNYC during a show about the MTA a lot of numbers were given. Some of the more dramatic numbers that I remember were that the subways get Six million riders on average per day and that the average price for a fare (post discounts, transitcheck, unlimited rides etc) was $1.30. Is this as straight foreward as it looks? Does the MTA generate seven million eight hundred thousand dollars a day just from the subway?!?
If this is correct, how in the world could they be short on cash? That is an astronomical amount of money! that equals two billion eight hundred forty-seven million dollars a year, just from the subway. and these numbers are from BEFORE the last fare hike.

Jul. 22 2008 11:25 AM
Jon P. from Hewitt, NJ

They want to tax you 8 more dollars to get into Manhattan with congestion pricing. Now they have more riders then they know what to do with. They should be swimming in revenue, right? Wrong, they want fare hikes and now could be swimming in 900 million dollar debt.

Please explain how that 150 million extra that they could have gotten from the FEDS for congestion pricing (and the extra revenue from the fee) would have actually gone towards more public transportation and not towards balancing their existing budget crises and filling the pockets of the miss managed MTA. For this reason, I’m so glad congestion pricing went down in flames…..

Jul. 22 2008 11:18 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.