Women Are Not Men

Sunday, February 24, 2013

In many ways, the gender gap is closing. In others, not so much. And that's not always a bad thing.


More in:

Comments [4]


Curious why would someone print this page.(there is a print button next to the player)

Mar. 20 2013 07:58 PM

"In many ways, the gender gap is closing. In others, not so much. And that's not always a bad thing."

You failed to provide a single example where it's not a bad thing. Did you think providing an example where it should be the men getting closer to the women's standard would suffice, and decide the line above would be inflammatory enough to draw attention?

Crappy podcast, I won't be back.

Mar. 03 2013 01:14 PM
Niraj Prasad from india

I do not contest that conflict ridden macho environment of WP maybe one of the reason. But we need to compare the women figure with the proportion of women authors.

However there may be one more reason. Women maybe thinking that they have better things to do with their life than editing some dry articles on wikipedia. No prospect of socializing on WP maybe make editing it look like a dry and uninteresting thing to do.

Feb. 27 2013 10:06 AM
K Nights

By the sounds of it the last thing men'll give up in the fight for gender equality is their pride.

Feb. 24 2013 05:30 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About Freakonomics Radio

In their books Freakonomics and SuperFreakonomicsSteven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner use the tools of economics to explore real-world behavior. As boring as that may sound, what they really do is tell stories — about cheating schoolteachers, self-dealing real-estate agents, and crack-selling mama’s boys. American Public Media’s Marketplace and WNYC are now bringing those Freakonomics stories — and plenty of new ones — to the radio, with Dubner as host. Just like the books, Freakonomics Radio will explore “the hidden side of everything.” It will tell you things you always thought you knew but didn’t, and things you never thought you wanted to know, but do.


Supported by