Bail System Needs Overhaul: NY's Top Judge

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

Chief Judge Jonathon Lippman is calling for a major overhaul of New York’s bail statutes, which he calls unfair.

In his annual State of the Judiciary address Tuesday, Judge Lippman called on legislators to change the law so judges would be required to consider public safety when setting bail and there would be a presumption of release for nonviolent offenders.

“Most nonviolent indigent defendants are sitting in jail because they can't make as little as $500 bail. That does not promote public safety. It's not a wise use of taxpayer dollars,” said Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice.

Lippman said nationally, the average cost of holding a defendant in jail is $19,000.

He also said the state should work to reform the bail bonds industry, which he said exerts too much influence over who is released from jail and who isn’t.

Lippman said since bail bondsmen rarely write bonds for defendants held on bails of $1,000 or less, “defendants charged with serious offenses are more likely to obtain bail bonds than those accused of minor crimes.”

Steven Banks with the Legal Aid of New York City said the current bail system punishes defendants before they're convicted of anything.

“When people are behind the prison walls of Rikers, it wears them down and the main goal is to get out and sometimes the goal of getting out overwhelms the goal of vindication,” Banks said.

Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes applauds Lippman’s calls for putting more requirements on released defendants instead of bail. He says the state could save money by expanding the use of GPS to monitor defendants.

“It's plain foolish not to adopt a system of $20,000 for a GPS system when the alternative cost of keeping someone in Riker's Island is annualized at $90,000 dollars,” Hynes said.

Hynes also highlighted a system at Red Hook Community Justice Center which sometimes allows a defendant to come back to court every three days in lieu of bail.

Listen above as WNYC's Soterios Johnson interviews Judge Lippman about the state's bail system.


Julianne Welby


More in:

Comments [2]


Regardless of the merits of Lippman's proposed changes to bail procedure, the fact remains that Lippman's status as Chief Judge was attained by fraud and is illegal and invalid. The evidence is undeniable available to anyone who can read. The specifics of the fraud perpetrated by Lippman in his rise to Chief Judge is detailed at the website:

Feb. 08 2013 01:45 AM

It is just plain foolish to believe that this system is just about costs. If this judge really wanted to fix the system, he would work to stop arresting people for things that they do not deserve to be arrested for. Society does not believe that we should arrest all of the people that we do. The reason that this judge wants to eliminate Bail Bondsmen is because he wants to keep this money for his court and the bail bondsmen do not make any money for the court. The court makes money off of the tethers and the fines and the drug tests on people that do not need them. 2 years ago NY lost a citizen because they were just let out of jail and now this judge wants to release everyone like that. Tethers are complete LIE, they do NOT prevent crimes and they do not ensure people go to court. The studys exist; there is a 80% chance that that tethers prevent a crime .1% of the time....those are the actual stats. LOL Now how safe do you feel and how do you feel about that $20k investment but it is cheaper than housing a prisoner. Maybe we just shouldn't arrest that person for simple possession - only 60% of the country believe that marijuana should LEGAL. Now that would help reduce the overcrowded jails but that will NEVER happen because that doesn't make the court any money.

Feb. 07 2013 05:58 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by