Streams

As NY Institutes New Gun Laws, Focus Shifts to Gun Industry Subsidies

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

An ad for a rifle manufactured by Remington, a company based in New York State that says it would be impacted by New York's new gun laws.

For the last five years, New York State has given $5.5 million to Remington Arms.

The money that went to Remington and its parent company, Freedom Group, led to the company focusing its manufacturing of firearms in the upstate community of Ilion, New York and closing its plants in Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Every year, the state gives out millions in tax incentives, loans and economic development grants to the private sector. Every state does it, and New York has little choice if it wants to prevent companies from leaving. The incentives to Remington are among $19.9 million given by nine states to makers of assault weapons in the last decade and were revealed in a list compiled by the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting.

In a letter sent January 3 to Empire State Development President Kenneth Adams, State Senator Liz Krueger urged an end to incentives for the firearms industry. 

“I’m still awaiting a formal letter of response, but I have been assured that this was a grant made in a previous administration, not in Gov. Cuomo’s administration, and the moneys that were committed have been spent,” Krueger said.

But others note that Remington has been manufacturing weapons in the state for nearly 200 years. And after the gun maker consolidated its manufacturing in Ilion, the town saw an increase in jobs.

“They were down to close to 600 jobs and now they’ve more than doubled that,” said Sen. Jim Seward, Ilion's representative in the legislature. “These are good manufacturing jobs and obviously we want them to stay.”

But as many as 40 of the guns manufactured in Ilion can no longer be sold to civilians in New York. The state’s new gun control law, known as the SAFE Act, bans semiautomatic weapons with certain design features deemed military-style, like detachable magazines or folding stocks. 

Seward says the company can still manufacture the banned guns in New York for export, but he believes cutting off Remington from future incentives would make it even harder to keep the operation in Ilion.

“I must point out that they are being constantly recruited by other states," Seward said. "And at some point, we hope this day does not come, but at some point, the company could say, 'hey, well why should we remain in a state that is perceived by many as being hostile to law-abiding gun ownership?'”

It’s not just Remington. Another manufacturer called Kimber, which makes guns that are not classified as assault weapons, received $700,000 from Empire State Development in 2009. And a Lewis County-based company called Otis Products, which makes gun-cleaning equipment, has received $2.2 million from the state and the local industrial development agency, according to a database compiled by the subsidy-tracking organization Good Jobs First.

In her letter to Empire State Development, Krueger didn’t specify between makers of military-style weapons and the rest of the industry. She says the state should prioritize other investments over gunmakers.

“There are large numbers of businesses who have applied for regional economic development grants, including from the same region that Remington is in," Krueger said. "They have been rejected from grants because there wasn’t enough money for them.”

This story is part of a series being produced by Innovation Trail.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [8]

Chuck

I would love to be the first person to buy a Remington Firearm made in Texas!!! It just makes sense.

Feb. 07 2013 01:10 PM
UD from Left Coast

Got any proof of firearms being sold online? And the numbers you posted.....Where did they come from?
Everyone screaming about "machine guns", assault weapons, and full capacity magazines should look at the stats.
Look up the NFA and the GCA. It's all there in black and white.
The US has the largest number of civilian firearm owners, but has less than a third or the crimes committed with firearms than the most restrictive countries. Look it up, including the UK and Austrailia.
Responsible gun owners won't allow ignorance and lies by the anti-gunners anymore.

Feb. 06 2013 01:20 AM
electedface from USA

40% of guns sold do not perform background checks on the buyer. These are acquired illegally through online gun sales, gun shows, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_hZQPpCJ1M

Feb. 05 2013 05:01 PM
Steve

The fact that 40 guns made by Remington are banned by the new law just illustrates how stupid the law is.

Among some of the banned guns:

The Remington 11-87 Turkey gun - a semi-automatic shotgun designed for turkey hunters.

The Remington 11-87 Sportsman® Shurshot™ Camo Cantilever - a semi-automatic shotgun designed for deer hunters.

The Remington R-15 and R-25 semi-automatic rifles intended for use by hunters.

Note that none of the banned Remington shotguns are shown on the list of banned guns on the NY Safe Act website even though they are clearly banned. I wonder why? Passed in haste in perhaps?

Feb. 05 2013 01:07 PM
LexLuthier

C'mon, you silly fools. You can't all sell financial services or pizzas or web site design to each other.
Seems like another part of the US is due another Solyndra type fiasco with that short-sighted an attitude.

I hope that Remington is able to take 1,200 skilled New Yorkers and their families to greener pastures when they move the Ilion plant to Ohio or Pennsylvania.

Lex

Feb. 05 2013 11:58 AM
Antonia Gilligan from Emerson

Regarding the subsidy to Remington Arms, I would like to add my voice to the negative response on a subsidy. My objection is different from the other previous comments.

Yes, we might lose some jobs but at what price do we pay for these jobs and environmental upgrading? Subsidies for established companies is money we should be using for other needs. As a person who decries frequent state subsidies, we often end up competing with other states.

Companies need to stand on their own resources and not feed at the public's expense. My option is based solely on economics and believe that subsidies in these times are corporate welfare at best.

AVG

Feb. 05 2013 11:53 AM

Who cares about these blood jobs??

Feb. 05 2013 10:55 AM
k webster from NYC

Use those subsidies to help SOME of these plants retool to become solar, wind, and other alternative resources factories. No matter how we feel about gun production, the reality of our common future does not lie in weapons production. The destruction facilitated by the overproduction of weapons won't be tolerated much longer. And physics won't wait for us to sort the looming (and present) catastrophe of climate change in our usual slow way.

Feb. 05 2013 10:15 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by