Photo credit: @julesdwit.
A not-for-profit media organization supported by people like you.
Democratic debate? LOL
Maybe you guys didn't get the memo. Hillary Clinton was chosen as our next president 3 years ago by private interests. You think they are counting our votes? LOL
I guess my take is a little different.
If the trick is a civil public discourse, it might be worth it to take a minute to figure out what we mean by civility. While surfing around today I found the Institute for Civility in Government.http://www.instituteforcivility.org/
They say.."Civility is claiming and caring for one's identity, needs and beliefs without degrading someone else's in the process."
I consider myself in the progressive camp, but fuming, spouting etc while it is fun and understandable, doesn't really move the discussion forward.
Brian, (Your show is as good as it gets -- and every bit as good as Diane Rehm's, IMHO!)
Please do a segment (or hit it again, if you feel you have already done one) on the nexus of
*World oil supply peaking*Global warming*Drought in Atlanta*Population and sustainability
In my opinion (and in that of many others) excess world population is the underlying driver for nearly all of the major global problems, but gets virtually no mention in the popular media, or is considered a taboo subject, because of abortion/right-to-life/racism issues. For instance, population control attempts in China are widely considered to be criminal (which because of their methods, probably are).
If I could ask each candidate three questions, they would be along the lines,
1) "Do you recognize that the population of the United States cannot grow infinitely?"
2) "If your answer to #1 was yes, what do you believe is the approximate optimum population level for the United States?" (By "optimum," I mean a level that allows for sustainable, decent living conditions for most of the population - enough water, food, space for each person.)
3) "What measures would you take to be sure that the population does not exceed that optimum level?
What I would like to know is why it took Mark H. so long to figure out that campaign hoopla is just so much hot air? Personally I only read or listen to the kind of reporting he's been doing by chance, when I can't avoid it. Is it really a revelation to Mark H that the candidates' take on the issues are what matter, and their record of what they have done in the past? This is really depressing. I'm hoping you will do a program on something called Project Vote Smart, an organization that has been compiling information on candidates' actions, sources of money, and other relevant information. They have now put on line information about every elected official in Washington and in state government. Thanks for your program, one of the fixtures in my life. Styra Avins
Well, I think the Dems interpretted his support as being useful because he wasn't one of their people. Of course, I think his credibility is seriously in question... not just because torture was carried out under his watch, but because he tried to weasel his way out of it.
Leo@10:52Your points are well taken, but it happened on his watch, so he is responsible. That's what chain of command is about. The fact that Rumsfeld may have outmanoeuvered him bureaucratically is no excuse.
My other point is independent of your more thorough explanation. Can't the Ds find anyone better to speak for them than someone who was in charge during Abu Garhib?
Can we try a blackout on the polls?!? They only limit discussion.
Do you remember President Howard Dean, the guy who was a sure thing because he was so far ahead in the polls?!?
To eCAHNomics: -- Though General Sanchez has a lot of explaining to do - I don't think he was involved in handling or approving the torture in Iraq. - These were policies carried out on the direct orders of Rumsfeld and other civilian appointees in the Defense dept and the White House. These were carried out by blurring the lines of command by getting units in the military, CIA, FBI and National Guard to carry out these human rights abuses. Most of the high ranking members of the military would not have endorsed or carried out these crimes
Sanchez on D radio address. Yeah, Ds really did themselves proud by having General Torture represent them. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Planting Qs: Don't all candidates do that? Why wasn't that the slant of news stories?
So to help out these people too busy to worry about the fate of the republic, how about a link to Amazon? Is any one keeping track of how many times this book, which sounds like democracy for dummies, is getting plugged?
Let's hope these people are too busy to make it to the polls.
Ghouliani's succes owes to the authoritarian nature of the R party.
Does Halperin's book address where the candidate gets his support? In the General Eletion we know much comes from the party, but where does it come from in the primary? Also whom are they beholden to? Whom would he or she appoint if elected? What type of judges would they nominate?
The horse race model has resulted in the press over covering the "front runners". All running for president have something to add to the debate and should be accorded similar respect.It's a very frightening lament by the press that "we have too many candidates"
I LIKE Mike Huckabee. However, if Mike Huckabee were elected President, it would be grounds for fleeing the United States for me. If his religious views translate into government policy, we should all give secession a serious look.
SUBJECT : Polling and Democracy.
Kindly offer up this challenging question to Mr. Halperin:
If there were NEVER any polls aired during political campaigns, I'd aver that our democracy just might be better off. If the American public were as wonkish on policy matters as it is on who's up and who's down and who's performing' well,, we would trruly be an educated and qualified electorate.
Jens M. Krummel, Sunnyside.
It all comes down to one simple fact; we have a two party system. Because of that, the race is simply one that favors the strongest candidate, in other words, which Democrat can beat the Republicans, and which Republican can beat the Democrats. Without a multi-party system, it will always be a horse race to pick the candidate based on perceived strength, not issues. That is why traditionally the taller candidate has always won (until Bush), etc.
As others have noted above, it seems pretty clear that Lott is getting out (w/ 5 years to go on his term) because of the change in lobbying regulations.
"A Lott friend said part of the reason, and a factor in the timing, is a new lobbying regulation, signed by President Bush in September, extending the existing lobbying ban for former members of Congress from one to two years. The lobbying ban takes effect at the end of this year."
C'mon Brian, why do you continue to give Mark Halperin not only airtime, but a free-pass on his highly debatable assertions of 'fact'? This is a man who wrote a book asserting that Karl Rove's strategy still works. I guess there's still the possibility that the Republicans can turn this all around, right Mark?
The press seems to be increasingly ignoring John Edwards, making it seem that only Clinton and Obama are running. I find this manipulative, if not downright undemocratic.
Regarding the issues, is it of any importance that Huckabee thinks the planet is 6,000 years old, and gets his guidance from an imaginary friend? Doesn't that pretty much trump the whole sense of humor thing?
Maybe it's a guy thing. Who's Chuck Norris?
Hey Brian@10:15Loved your Freudian typo. Brian Lamp/Lamb does shed light on matters.
Question for Mr. Halperin... Does he have any comments regarding the Vanity Fair article from Oct 2007, by Evgenia Peretz...regarding the press coverage of Al Gore vs. that of Geo Bush?
Huckabee thinks the fact that U.S. gives Paksitan $10 billion gives U.S. the right to invade Pakistan. Where do the Rs find all these nutcases?
The media is pathetic when it comes to election coverage.
What makes someone a good president is a subjective thing, not an objective thing.
How about this for coverage: take an issue, define it and then have each candidate tell us where they stand on it. Then WE can decide without the media telling us how people are doing in the polling--who cares.
Radical isn't it!
Brian Lehrer and Brian Lamp should be in charge of the campaign coverage.
Duh, Mark. Good campaigners don't necessarily make good administrators. How much does TIME pay you, anyway?
The only part of a horse race that the R candidates represent is the horse's rear end.
I hear that Lott's replacement is not governor appointed, but rather a special election will be called. Wouldn't swear that's true yet, though.
Lobbying!!! The year-end deadline for the 2 year waiting list. Any possibility that Halperin was born last night?!?
Sandra Day O'Connor may be the person in Washington to ever resign to spend more time with her family
he's cashin' in. he's retiring before the end of the year to beat the two year ban from lobbying congress. period.
don't be daft.
Hastert is getting out of town one step in advance of the sherrif.
Trent Lott is resigning in advance of 2 year waiting period for lobbying that takes effect in January.
this comment was edited to comply with our guidelines. Please review them below: http://www.wnyc.org/about/terms_comments.html
Here's a little insight:Mark Halperin has a hysterical op-ed in the NYT today, designed to be a mea culpa for the failures of presidential campaign journalism. Halperin reveals the reason behind the press corps’ obsession with horse race politics–they all read Ben Cramer’s What It Takes–and then admits that success in a political horse race does not necessarily equip someone to run the country.
Wow, Mark, that’s one doozy of an insight. You mean all this horse race campaign journalism is counter-productive to choosing a good president? Who could have imagined that?!?!?!…
Link to above: http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2007/11/it-takes-analys.html#more
Brian-Get guests who actually have some gray matter between their ears.
Email addresses are required but never displayed.
Brian Lehrer leads the conversation about what matters most now in local and national politics, our own communities and our lives.
Subscribe on iTunes
WNYC 93.9 FM and AM 820 are New York's flagship public radio
stations, broadcasting the finest programs from NPR and PRI, as well as a wide range of award-winning local
programming. WNYC is a division of
New York Public Radio.