Streams

Fiscal Cliff Cuts Would be Deepest for New York's Disadvantaged

Thursday, December 06, 2012

New York stands to take a $600 million hit in 2013 if Congress fails to avert automatic spending cuts slated for January, which would fall disproportionately on poor and middle-income New Yorkers, according to a new study. 

The report released Thursday by Comptroller Tom DiNapoli identifies over $200 million in cuts to education programs, $137 million lost to Health and Human Services programs, and hundreds of millions more in federal housing, transportation, and other areas of assistance.

This all comes as part of sequestration, a measure to impose across-the-board reductions in spending to reduce the deficit if Congress can’t agree on a plan of their own.

“Very simply, that translates into cuts in special education, AIDS treatment, health care, public housing, capital investments for transportation–essential services that we need in New York, especially for our neediest families,” DiNapoli said at a breakfast forum on Thursday morning.

Grants and other funding for education would face the largest cuts. The most money would be saved from reductions in Title I, which directs funds to schools and school districts with a high percentage of students from low-income families. DiNapoli estimates an $86 million cut to the program.

“Title 1 and IDEA are the two most concerning right now,” said Lana Ajemian, president of the New York State Parent Teacher Association. “Those districts are more dependent on federal aid.”

An earlier estimate by the National Education Association puts the loss to Title I at $90 million. The second highest reduction comes from IDEA grants for special education, to the tune of $62 million.

Most of the stress on K-12 education wouldn’t be seen until late 2013 or even 2014, Ajemian said. When the state’s education apparatus starts to feel those cuts, it will be in the form of larger class sizes, curriculum changes, job losses, and changes to programs like professional development.

The first education program to be affected by sequestration would be Impact Aid, which goes to school districts containing tax-exempt federal property.

“Military families, children on Indian reservations or federal housing, that’s gonna be the first hit that you see out of the gate in January,” Ajemian said.

DiNapoli’s study also notes a $153 million cut to National Institutes of Health funding in New York, a loss bemoaned by the state’s medical schools and research hospitals. Representatives from the state’s congressional delegation including Charles Rangel, Jerrold Nadler, and Carolyn Maloney went to bat for preserving these funds earlier in the week, arguing the cuts would equate to an overall loss of $1.2 billion to the state’s economy and significant job losses.

Reps. Maloney and Nadler have also joined Congressman Peter King and New York Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Charles Schumer in calling for the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund to be protected from the sequester. While not a source of state funding, the VCF, enacted by the Zadroga Act in 2010, was set up to compensate victims and first responders suffering from 9/11-related illnesses and injuries. It would be cut by almost $40 million in 2013.

“What might be promised to John Smith the firefighter, he might not get because of that cut,” said John Feal, a first responder who heads the FealGood Foundation and has been a staunch advocate for the Zadroga Act.

Feal doesn’t think the sequester will happen, though. And if it does, he expects either Senator Gillibrand or Schumer to introduce legislation exempting the VCF from cuts in January.

The state’s congressional delegation can’t do that with every program, though, and in some cases the ramifications of automatic cuts remain unclear. Funding for museums and libraries faces sequester, but officials at the national level are unsure whether cuts would come to states across the board or would be allocated in some other way. New York is also one of nine states that participates in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study—State Health Department officials don’t know whether their funding for the study will be eliminated, or simply reduced.

In some places, the crystal ball is cloudy. In others, it's perfectly clear. Comptroller DiNapoli said there was a recurring theme to what we know about how sequestration will impact the state. 

“The fiscal cliff threatens all New Yorkers, but particularly middle class and lower income families who I think would bear the brunt of these combination of tax hikes and cuts to very, very critical programs.”

Ilya Marritz contributed reporting.

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [3]

A Promise, Not Some Inane Pledge

With Congress and the administration so bumfuzzled about how to achieve a reasoned and rational agreement (expressly avoided using the sane and intelligent ‘compromise’ terminology) for addressing the self-imposed fiscal cliff, the American public needs to stand-up for their interests and make a promise to themselves. While “failure is not an option” on the fiscal cliff makes a nice sound-bite, I don’t really have any confidence that Congress (the Constitutionally responsible player in this game) will find a way off the cliff. Therefore, I think every voter should make a promise to their self should Congress fail yet again to do what the country needs; that is Congress must take some action to address the crisis besides inaction.

Now I also don’t believe that Congress is capable or competent enough to actually take the right actions, but I do at least expect them to try within their limited abilities to make the efforts necessary to address the nation’s issues, particularly those that affect the economy is such basic ways. Congress must decide and deliver a federal budget, tax policy and a program reform plan to resolve the budget versus spending gaps caused by their approved budget. If they don’t or can’t do that then what exactly are our Congressional representatives actually doing for you?

So what is the promise that you need to make to yourself? Well, be they Democrat or Republican (or an Independent) you need to promise to not support, fund or vote to return them to office in their respective next election cycle. You should make it abundantly clear to any party official that you come in contact with that you will not and are not going to vote for that member. It’s ok to vote and support another member of your preferred political party if you are so inclined to what to be affiliated with a political party; but not the current member.

If you do make that promise to yourself, then you should convey that promise to your current representatives in Congress; be they a member of your party or not. Just like your employers would do at your job, you should let under-performing workers know that their jobs are at risk due to poor-performance but that with a demonstration of improvement their jobs might not be at risk.

This isn’t a pledge that someone else defines and dictates to you. It’s a responsibility you have to yourself. You decide, you assess and you act. You don’t give money and power to someone else who will use your influence to their ends. It’s almost like being a free individual who is willing to participate in their democratic process.

Dec. 09 2012 11:42 AM
caitlin magee

Can you clearify whose taxes will be raised Personal taxes? or Corporate Taxes? ans Why does a Raise in Personal taxes affect hiring?

Dec. 09 2012 10:49 AM
listener

Just a reminder...two years ago in 2010 when Speaker Pelosi controlled the House, the Congress could have swiftly raised taxes and the debt ceiling in order to pay for the trillions they authorized without a serious budget.

They deliberately caused a massive financial crisis which torments us to this day because they wanted to split the Republican Party and pressure them to massively raise taxes for the debt the Democrats added.

The Democrats deliberately and cynically put their political power and agenda way ahead of the interests of the nation who they skillfully deceived and now we face economic decline and collapse.

And thanks to their supporters....it worked perfectly. Take a bow.

Dec. 07 2012 11:07 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by