Photo credit: @julesdwit.
A not-for-profit media organization supported by people like you.
Sarah Janssen, NRDC senior scientist for health, talks about the study that found high levels of toxic or untested flame retardants in 85% of the couches tested.
How long do these chemicals "evaporate"? In other words, how long are these pieces unsafe?
A few questions:
1) Do foreign manufacturers (not owned by US companies) have to conform to US flame standards? In other words, if I buy an Italian sofa, will it contain the flame retardants?
2) How do I know if a piece of furniture contains Tris or not if I do not live in CA?
3) Does anyone know of reliable manufacturers who have pledged to not use these flame retardants?
Excellent source of information at online watchdog group, http://greensciencepolicy.org/ No discussion on flame retardant toxins in consumer goods is complete with out acknowledging the work of biophysical chemist, Green Science Policy Org. director and high-altitude mountaineer Arelene Blum.
Let's not forget Philip Morris' and RJR's role in all this:
"Philip Morris collaborated with the marshals on flame retardant furniture standards in the early 1990s, he said, because the company believed those might present "a potentially more effective alternative for improved fire safety."
"The lobbyist worried that "the relationship of the industry — especially Philip Morris — to the National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) may eventually be disclosed publicly." She suggested to the Tobacco Institute that the fire marshals stop discussing fire-safe cigarettes and focus solely on furniture flammability standards.
"But the industry didn't sever ties, in part because other cigarette executives thought they needed the marshals to counter fire-service groups that were pushing for fire-safe cigarette laws, records show. . . .
"The plan used italics to hammer home the urgency of focusing on the furniture fueling fires, not the cigarettes igniting them: "In 1996, fire officials must keep the pressure on the Commission to focus on the fuels rather than ignition sources."
"The fire marshals' actions helped Big Tobacco fend off fire-safe requirements for years. . . . "
--"Big Tobacco wins fire marshals as allies in flame retardant push"
Re "we're not in California,": If Manufacturers can do so cheaply, they build all their products to the most restrictive standards, and then sell the product everywhere, rather than build a California-only model. Therefore, California laws affect us all.
Chemicals in all our hygene prroducts are banned in europe for causing cancer. Gmos are banned in other countries for causing cancer. Cleaning products cause cancer when baking soda works better and isgood for you. Diesel causes cancer. Alcohol causes cancer. Cannabis cures cancer. Run for the cure? Lets run for not getting pourposly poisoned by our government and corperations that profit from cancer. Chemo therapy makes cancer worse.
Um, we're not in California, lady. Give us some info we can use!
Do the memory foams have these retardants?
Wool fabric is naturally flame-retardant.Most synthetic fabrics are not. In fact, Con Ed forbids line workers from wearing synthetic clothing when working on high voltage.Wool is also very comfortable to sit on.
Are leather couches any safer than fabric ones?
So this is what the government "protecting" us has gotten to: the flame retardants to protect you from your burning sofa now leads to treating furniture with this and other chemicals. Now that we've legislated so much protection, do we have to make laws about each and every chemical they can and cannot use?
Email addresses are required but never displayed.
Brian Lehrer leads the conversation about what matters most now in local and national politics, our own communities and our lives.
Subscribe on iTunes
WNYC 93.9 FM and AM 820 are New York's flagship public radio
stations, broadcasting the finest programs from NPR and PRI, as well as a wide range of award-winning local
programming. WNYC is a division of
New York Public Radio.