Streams

GOP Senators More Troubled About Benghazi After Talking With Amb. Rice

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

After meeting with U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice this morning, three key Republican senators emerged to say they're more troubled — not less — by what they say were intelligence failures and misleading information concerning the September attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, which left four Americans dead.

One, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said it's too soon to even be speculating about promoting Rice to be secretary of state.

Congress needs to see "FBI interviews of survivors ... and what was said the night of the attack" about who might be responsible, Graham said, before considering the promotion of anyone who was involved in handling the intelligence before or after the Benghazi attack.

Graham was joined by senators John McCain of Arizona and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. She said she's "more troubled, not less," after talking with Rice and top U.S. intelligence officials about the attacks.

Though President Obama has not yet nominated anyone to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (who plans to soon leave), McCain, Graham and some other Republicans have already been saying they have doubts about whether Rice should get that job. They say she misled the nation by saying that the attacks may have begun as protests over a anti-Muslim video produced in California. The Obama administration and Rice's supporters say she was relying on guidance from intelligence agencies and that she did note that extremists may have been involved in the attacks.

She'll be meeting with other lawmakers. As The Associated Press writes, "Rice's series of meetings on Capitol Hill this week will therefore be a critical test both for Republicans, who will decide whether they can support her, and the administration, which must gauge whether Rice has enough support to merit a nomination."

Update at 12:45 p.m. Statements Not 'Intended To Mislead':

Abassador Susan Rice says during her meeting with the lawmakers, she stressed that while her statements were inaccurate they were not intended to mislead.

Here's the key part of the statement just released by the U.S. Mission to the United Nations:

"In the course of the meeting, we explained that the talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi. While we certainly wish that we had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack, as is often the case, the intelligence assessment has evolved. We stressed that neither I nor anyone else in the Administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the Administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved."

Copyright 2012 National Public Radio. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Source: NPR

Tags:

More in:

News, weather, Radiolab, Brian Lehrer and more.
Get the best of WNYC in your inbox, every morning.

Comments [2]

sk

Wish these Republicans had put in as much effort to get to the bottom of the Iraq WMD lies before plunging our country into war and debt. If these people cared even half as much about exposing "cover ups" back then, war could have been averted and THOUSANDS of our soldiers wouldn't have died.

Nov. 27 2012 10:59 PM
JEAN from Midwest

Many are counting on these 3 Congressmen to garner more help to get to bottom of Benghazi, Libya's "Dealings" between CIA/AlQada. There is much more to find out from many more that were there, and lived to tell the world. (Seek and find them, PLEASE, for America, Our Country).

Nov. 27 2012 09:32 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by