Opinion: Why Bloomberg's Obama Endorsement is a Vote for Competence, Compassion

Thursday, November 01, 2012 - 03:59 PM

Mayor Bloomberg's last-minute announcement of support for President Obama is an endorsement of competent governance.

It is an endorsement that will appeal to Bloomberg's biggest enthusiasts: the political pundits. It is a the loudest reference to climate change this campaign season. And as much as anything, it is an indictment of the political journey of MItt Romney.

Many won't be surprised that New York's mayor would back the president. He is socially liberal, an outspoken advocate of marriage equality and reproductive rights, who has spent considerable money promoting both causes. He is a believer in robust government action - a value more likely to find a home in the national Democratic Party than with the Republicans. His claim to fame is as a business mind, and he must see that the economy has moved the right direction, if not quickly enough, in the past four years.

However, Bloomberg had been claiming a vow of silence. He had publicly reprimanded both candidates over their refusal to take on gun control in a strong, unyielding way. He had just announced a SuperPAC that he was clear would not back a Presidential camp. Bloomberg has himself been talked of as a presidential candidate and has enjoyed his ambiguous partisanship. Staying out seemed to be part of his brand as a non-ideological independent.

So what changed?

On the surface, the events this week surrounding Hurricane Sandy made his choice clear. Under Republicans, FEMA was gutted; under Democrats, it has been rebuilt. Republican leaders decry "big government." Democrats talk about how we prepare for challenges bigger than any individual citizen, city or state. Mitt Romney spent the week setting up photo-ops and running discredited ads. President Obama spent it - like Mayor Bloomberg, Governor Cuomo, Governor Christie and other elected and appointed officials - governing.

Furthermore, as Bloomberg Businessweek announced on its cover: "It's Global Warming, Stupid." While neither candidate campaigned on climate change, one of them has a record of taking sensible steps as President. The other used climate change as a convention speech punchline. Mocking rising water levels, and the earnest effort to address them, is no longer very funny.

Maybe Bloomberg is basing his endorsement on Obama's record which looks similar to Bloomberg's own: willing to take some measures that would be derided as "nanny state" for the public good; a measured approach to employing public and private tools to boost the economy; a comfort with police and security approaches that outrage civil libertarians; socially progressive, though not radical. Obama's record is not a liberal agenda, by any means, but one that resembles the Mayor's.

Or maybe Bloomberg's endorsement is an investment in a discussion of climate change. It's his way of saying that sensible, business-minded, independent-branded, cross-partisan aspiring, centrist-sounding, non-ideological, good-governance technocrats care about what we're doing to the earth and believe we can do better. It's Bloomberg's way of endorsing not just a candidate, but an issue, and elevating it for the next four years.

And just as likely, Bloomberg's announcement is a condemnation of the right-wing gravitational pull that has turned Mitt Romney from the sort of politician that would have agreed with Bloomberg, to one that has had to chase votes from the most fanatical, paranoid, xenophobic, anti-science, extreme factions of our society. It's Bloomberg's critique not just of Romney, but of the process that he was submitted to and the transformation he allowed to take place.

When Bloomberg feared having to pander to those voices, he left the Republican Party. When Romney wanted to become a presidential candidate, he capitulated to them. And that, more than anything, is the difference between the two.

Not everyone would care for a Bloomberg endorsement. Conservatives think he's too lefty. Liberals (myself included) have opposed him on extending term limits, suppressing Occupy Wall Street and his ceaseless defense of Wall Street's worst players. Bloomberg doesn't have a political base, which is why he never ran for national office, other than the pundit class that craves cross-partisan characters. If nothing else, though, winning over a few Thomas Friedmans and David Brookses to Obama is a useful measure.

What would be more useful is if this announcement signifies that Bloomberg not only endorses the candidate, but will push the president to govern in meaningful and ambitious ways over the next four years on the issues the Mayor cares most about: comprehensive immigration reform, marriage equality, illegal guns and, yes, climate change.

Even more meaningful - if the president's acceptance of Bloomberg's endorsement is his own endorsement of those ideas, and his commitment to governing for the next four years with the competence, compassion and commitment he has put on display this past week.


More in:

Comments [5]

Paul D. Gibbs from Boston, MA

Mayor Bloomberg and Gov Christie change the NYC marathon into a charity run for NY and NJ relief efforts. Over the GW bridge and back thorough the Holland Tunnel between Newark and NYC to symbolize the unity effort for recovery in both states. Sponsored by the Red Cross and other non-profits. Make those runners feel like they are part of the solution. Flash mob coordination and Big City participation. People sponsor the runners on an app or online. Cool idea. Pass it along.

Nov. 03 2012 10:27 PM
carey from nyc

Just heard a listener complain about the Superfund site Gowanus Canal.
If Bloomberg cared as much as he claims to care about the planet - then why would allow this Superfund site to exist in this city for his entire 3 term tenure. What has he done to purify the waters. It's frustrating, I know he can't be all things to all people, that is one person...but he is the mayor and now he claims to care about the environment. Well how about caring about the warming oceans and what NYC deposits into those waters.

People who care, care about the discharge into the river.

Nov. 02 2012 05:52 PM
Jay from Riverdale

Yes, I agree Justin. In my view, Bloomberg decided to recant his decision not to endorse a presidential candidate because he believed so strongly in the importance of the climate change issue to the city he governs and to every living thing in the world. His endorsement of Obama is an endorsement of the conclusions drawn by the world's best scientists with respect to the causes and effects of climate change, and his refusal to accept the counter-argument put forth by the myopic, self-serving, moneyed interests, as a plausible alternative view. Bloomberg's endorsement also speaks to the larger issue of the benefits of Governmental regulation of commerce for the public good, and in the case of global warming, the very existential future of our world.

Nov. 02 2012 03:45 PM

"Partisanship didn't get in the way"
Then again, maybe it did but this is "good" partisanship.

If only another trillion borrowed from China was spent on solar panels, bureaucrats and regulators then the hurricane would never have happened.
And if it did happen that only means that Mother Earth demands even more sacrifice from the little people and our elite and wealthy elders in progressive politics will tell us how to live our lives without changing their own as they look down paternally from their ivory tower and fly off to Davos and Rio to discuss climate change.
Since this involves our planet and is a never ending state of emergency then how can recalcitrant deniers and resisters to the saving of the planet be tolerated? Better question; how is this compatible with the US Constitution that the President and members of Congress take an oath to defend?

Nov. 01 2012 11:51 PM
Brandt Hardin

Obama has time and time again tried to champion Clean Energy Sources to help curb Global Warming. Public access to real facts is being whitewashed by this rhetoric while conservative hands paint the Blackface on our President. Watch them mix and apply the paints to his face in a portrait of Obama being Bamboozed by the Far Right at

Nov. 01 2012 08:39 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by