Streams

Opinion: Free Jill Stein, Third Parties

Monday, October 22, 2012 - 10:21 AM

While Barack Obama and Mitt Romney debated at Hofstra University on Tuesday night, there should have been a third stool on the stage. Not for Clint Eastwood's empty chair, but for a rival whose ideas would have challenged the two major party candidates to step beyond their comfort level on a host of issues.

There was no third stool though. Instead of joining on the stage, in the auditorium or even on the campus, Jill Stein - the Green Party presidential nominee - found her seat in jail, arrested for disorderly conduct as she walked with 200 protesters down the road from the debate.

Stein's night in custody is a pretty simple metaphor for a problem in our presidential politics. Perspectives that would enlarge our political discussion are blocked from entreating mainstream discourse. When they can't be laughed off, casually dismissed or simply ignored, they get suppressed by police tactics that both major parties condone.

What would have been so radical about Stein's presence? She probably wouldn't have raced against the two men on stage to see who could go furthest in boasting about oil production. While the president skewered the Governor over the 47 percent, Stein may have asked the president where his plan has been for helping Americans facing foreclosure. While Romney chatted on about the engine of business, Stein may have asked about punishing the titans of Wall Street who had cost us so many jobs - a measure neither party has pursued in full. And as both men jousted over America's role in the Middle East and North Africa, Stein may have made the case that drone attacks, assassinations and undeclared wars are only imperiling us, not making us safer.

But you wouldn't think that a presidential candidate would voice those ideas if you only know about the Democrats and Republicans. You wouldn't realize that Rocky Anderson has made a real commitment to campaign finance reform with the Justice Party, or Libertarian Gary Johnson wants to transform marijuana laws. Because all of them have been shunted out of the public eye. Their ideas have been arrested.

Beyond the metaphor, though, it may be more disturbing that Stein herself was arrested for peacefully seeking to participate in our political discourse. The media blackout of third parties may ultimately be more insidious and effective at silencing them; but Americans should be outraged at the simpler act of arresting a legitimate candidate who was seeking to be heard. Even if you don't care about third party politics, this alone should have a chilling effect on your view of our democracy.

I am not a committed third party advocate, not convinced it's the fastest or most important way to create progressive change. I'm not opposed to more parties either, when they voice something that deserves to be heard, and when they take serious steps to organize their constituents. I think there are clear differences between Democrats and Republicans - though also too many issues where they agree too much.

It sounds like something out of a darker past or a dystopian novel to hear that presidential candidates are being arrested. You can be an idealistic radical and assert that this shows that the "system" is scared of their ideas, which is why they take such measures. But I feel that we should be more scared of a "system" capable of doing this to so little outrage or reaction.

I'd say that such a worry would make me sound like a Tea Partier…except those defenders of liberty haven't been outspoken for Stein, Anderson or Johnson either. In any case, even those Americans who plan to vote for a major party should be concerned. Americans who embrace relatively mainstream politics probably espouse the ideas of freedom of expression and the desire for a vibrant democracy. What's more mainstream American than that?

Tags:

More in:

Comments [6]

Ben from Brooklyn

It's more than a little disheartening that WNYC chose not to cover or even mention the third party debate that took place Tuesday night in Chicago. The 4 candidates spoke about issues rather than attacking one another (a positive symptom of a debate that involves more than 2 people). 90 million voting age Americans will not vote in this election because they think they have only 2 choices and they don't like either of them. Americans need to know they have other options. If WNYC won't discuss it, who will? A vote for a third party candidate is not a wasted vote!! In fact, unless you live in a swing state, voting for a dem. or rep. is MORE of a waste. Your vote will not help elect the president, and your voice will not be heard. I live in NY. Obama WILL win NY. I will vote for a third party candidate to demand that their voices be heard and to cast a vote for a change in American politics. Shame on you WNYC (and specifically Brian Lehrer, whose show I absolutely LOVE) for not giving these candidates and their ideas airtime.
P.S. - there will be another third party debate on Oct 30

Oct. 25 2012 05:11 PM
Blanche from North Jersey

The two-party system holds us all hostage. I wrote about this a year ago, in anticipation of the election a few weeks from now. http://ramblesphere.blogspot.com/2011/11/vote-em-out.html
I'm as frustrated now as I was then. Why on earth would any citizen, no matter their party affiliation, tolerate the silencing of Jill Stein's voice, and in such a clearly anti-democratic way? It's insane. 'They came for the Greens, but I wasn't a Green, so I said nothing . . . .'

Oct. 23 2012 12:50 PM
Pir8Danou from Berlin, germany

It'S really sad, that the migthyest contry on earth has such an underdeveloped democracy. that makes me think & Worry.

greeting from go'ol Germany!

My last tweet 2 share the news was: "Die #Grünen aus USA wurden nicht zum Presidental Talk #USELECTION http://www.ustream.tv/election2012 eingeladen: http://www.wnyc.org/blogs/its-free-blog/2012/oct/22/opinion-free-jill-stein-third-parties/"

Oct. 22 2012 11:01 PM
Julian from Houston, Tx

The presidential debate is a private event, formed by both the Republican and Democratic Parties, where both parties agree to play patty cakes. Before this, the debate was organised by third organisations such as The League of Woman Voters.
Under this premise, Jill was disrupting a private event, therefore, lawfully detained...
While it is utter nonsense and dishonesty, it is what it is. We should really seek for an end to these ridiculous REP-DEM debates, that are made to seem very official and whatnot. It is nothing more than a political trust between both parties.

Oct. 22 2012 09:16 PM
PumaNC from NC

Welcome to the Bannana Republic of America.
I am voting for Jill Stein and for democracy.

Oct. 22 2012 05:38 PM

Bravo, Justin, for calling attention to this. I will be voting for Jill Stein. A vote for either major-party candidate is a vote to continue the status quo.

Oct. 22 2012 02:16 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Authors

Feeds

Supported by