Opinion: Unemployment Report Means Romney's New Problem Number is the 8%

Friday, October 05, 2012 - 10:47 AM

The backdrop of a Romney campaign rally in Denver on October 1, 2012. (Anna Sale/WNYC)

The newest number has entered this year's election arithmetic: the 8 percent. That's the unemployment level that has been plaguing the Obama Administration -- and the mark below which the jobless rate just fell for the first time in Obama's presidency.

Many numbers were tossed around in Wednesday's math-heavy debate. Romney repeated the false claim that Obama is cutting $716 billion from Medicare. Obama kept hitting on the $5 trillion that Romney would cut in taxes to the wealthiest Americans. To some, Romney's apparent numeracy was a sign of his competence and confidence.

But 8 percent may prove harder for Romney to handle. It's one indicator that the central tenet of his campaign -- that Obama's not on the right direction -- is wrong.

It would be ironic if this number upends him in a way no other number could. His role as poster-boy for the 1 percent has made him seem like a defender of the super-rich, out of touch with working Americans. The energy of the 99 percent pushed the debate to focus on wealth disparity, an area where Romney was weaker. His indictment of the 47 percent showed what a limited view of America he has. Even as he back-pedaled from it, his running-mate introduce the 30 percent who he claims don't pursue the American Dream.

Yet -- to the dismay of many Americans -- not of these percents even made it into the math-wars on display on Wednesday. Obama may have seen his avoidance of these charged numbers as a way of coming off presidential and less aggressive. Critics saw it as a foolish choice and missed opportunity.

So Mr. 47 percent dodged a bullet just to be hit by a real October surprise: a positive jobs report.

Now, the truth is it's not enough. Unemployment under 8 percent isn't a lofty enough goal for the ambitions of America. And it doesn't account the many Americans who are accepting part-time jobs because they can't find full-time employment, or the many more who have dropped out of the workforce entirely out of frustration.

This number shouldn't let the GOP off the hook for blocking the American Jobs Act, or absolve Democrats who didn't fight hard enough.

Only an absurdly framed national debate would claim "just under 8 percent!" a boast-worth slogan. Then again, it's that same absurdly framed national debate who would call someone a debate-winner by virtue of dutifully repeated lies.

No Americans should be satisfied with this progress, but we can feel OK that it will change the news cycle from talking about the good and bad jobs done in a debate, to a debate about good and bad jobs plans. And maybe it will get Americans asking, thinking, learning and talking about the candidates' real economic plans in a way the debate failed to do.


More in:

Comments [4]


Fair point RUCB. Perhaps critics will come back with the data and also legal challenges to the unconstitutional actions of this administration...

after the election is safely over.....

and that is the whole idea.

Oct. 07 2012 09:20 PM
RUCB_Alum from Central New Jersey

@listener -

Unless you have some proof - you, Jack Welch, and every other doubter are just expressing your IOH - irrational Obama hatred. Your opinion is not grounded in any evidence or facts that you can supply. It is just another religion. Even Romney's poo-pooing on the basis of workers leaving the job pool - though shown to be false - is more rational than your assertion.

Come back with some data.

Oct. 07 2012 10:58 AM

Considering the track history of this administration it is not exactly surprising that the unemployment rate would magically drop below 8 percent just one month before the election.
What is stunning and disturbing is that the credulous of some is taken to new heights when they really start believing the deception and become emotionally dependent on the mendacity.

Oct. 06 2012 10:47 PM
RUCB_Alum from Central New Jersey

Listen to how many 'voters' you will hear quoted saying that they don't believe or trust the numbers. I cannot believe how many Americans are attempting to brush this off as an election prank. Greet the good news first and THEN warn about the election least if you consider yourself a good American.

Remember what happened the last time an accusation of 'wag the dog' stopped a President's hand. And remember the price we paid for letting bin Laden go.

Oct. 06 2012 09:05 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by