Streams

Obama's Debate Damage Control: Romney Was 'Artful Dodger'

Thursday, October 04, 2012

President Barack Obama walks away from Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney after the Presidential Debate at the University of Denver on October 3, 2012. (Getty)

Following what is widely believed to be a lackluster performance by President Obama in his first debate with Mitt Romney, the Obama campaign has tried to undermine the accuracy of his opponent and explain glaring omissions from the president's arguments.

“President Obama didn’t view it, perhaps as much as Governor Romney did, as a performance,” said David Axelrod, Senior Strategist to the Obama campaign, in a conference call Thursday morning. “I readily concede that that’s not the president’s strong suit in these events.”

Over and over, the campaign stressed that Obama had truth on his side, even if the delivery left something to be desired.

“Mitt Romney gave a good performance,” Axelrod said. “The problem with it was none of it was rooted in facts.”

But last night, “fact” was allowed to remain in the eye of the beholder. Moderator Jim Lehrer didn’t make much of an effort to vet the myriad citations and figures from each candidate. To make matters more confusing, each candidate was allowed to spit out many talking points across a too-wide range of topics in answers to too-broad questions, with time limits woefully ignored.

For those keeping score at home, PolitiFact has started giving the Truth-o-Meter treatment to last night’s claims. Out of 18 remarks rated so far between the two candidates, only three came out as “True.” Two of the three belonged to Mitt Romney: a claim that Obama once promised to "cut the deficit in half," and that the president failed to cut health care premiums by $2,500.  The one "True" that PolitiFact has given Obama so far is for saying he relied on the same advisers for "Obamacare" that Romney did for "Romneycare."

All the rest were half-true, mostly true, mostly false, or just plain false—so distortion is not the one-sided phenomenon that either campaign would have you believe.

More than what either candidate said, and whether or not it was true, perhaps most surprising was what the president didn’t say. Even given the broad questions, Obama avoided hitting certain phrases and lines of attack that his base had expected to hear. There was no mention of the “47 percent” and nothing about Bain Capital, which have both figured prominently in Obama campaign commercials, mailings, and press releases.

That prompted liberal supporters to express frustration with the president’s performance. Once the debate was over, MSNBC host Chris Matthews went so far as to ask, “Where was Obama tonight?”

The campaign brushed those omissions off as being part of the strategy.

“President Obama was focusing on the questions that were asked,” explained Axelrod. “He was not as intense as Romney on dropping particular lines. I understand a lot of our supporters would have liked him to enter into the record Bain, the tax returns, the 47 percent, but his choice was to talk about the things people were worried about in their own lives.”

Axelrod called Romney an “artful dodger” and said that made the debate a more challenging kind of event. Asked about whether the campaign had budgeted more prep time in advance of the next debate, Axelrod said they would just focus on strategic adjustments.

“We have to strike a balance. You can’t allow [Romney] to stand there and basically manhandle the truth about their own record and ideas and about yours, and not deal with that. I’m sure this is a takeaway from this debate.”

Tags:

More in:

Comments [2]

@Irv - You want balance? Go watch FoxNews. I'm told their are both fair and balanced.

Romney scored a win an a 'must win' situation. By appearing flat Obama did him a favor. Two more to go.

Oct. 05 2012 09:12 AM
Irv Herman from Oakland,CA

Balanced review? Quoting Axelrod and Matthews.

Oct. 04 2012 06:30 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Country ®

Archive of It's A Free Country articles and posts. Visit the It's A Free Country Home Page for lots more.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Feeds

Supported by