Streams

MTA Tax Reversal

Monday, August 27, 2012

Ted Mann, transportation reporter for the Wall Street Journal's Greater New York section, talks about the judge’s ruling against the MTA payroll tax.

Guests:

Ted Mann

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Comments [8]

Peter from Manhattan

CK from Yorktown: Yes, there are tolls on some bridges. The problem is that there are some bridges without tolls, and that distorts traffic patterns all over the city. Broadway Bridge and Brooklyn Bridge are examples of toll-free bridges that invite toll-shopping, to the detriment of surrounding neighborhoods.

Aug. 27 2012 12:15 PM
Jeff Pappas from Dumbo

Is the tax paid for by the worker, the employer, or split ? I have heard both sides so far.
.35 cents/ $ 100 max doesnt seem so bad , its much less than tolls to drive into NYC
We need more public transportation.

Aug. 27 2012 12:13 PM
Mary from The East Village

I'm generally not a "don't tax meeeee!!!!" person, but I hated paying the MTA tax as a freelancer. I got emails about it a few times a month and it didn't apply to all of my income, so at some point in the year, I just wrote them a check for 200 bucks and called it a day. I ended up owing them less than my accountant would have charged me if I'd gone into her for a visit -- if I'd actually taken it seriously and paid them quarterly, it really would have cost me a bunch in fees.

I don't mind taxes that I have to add in at the end of the year, but I found this tax really annoying. It no longer applies to certain types of freelancers, including me. I want the MTA to be financially healthy, but it was really just an annoying way to collect a tax.

Aug. 27 2012 11:36 AM
CK from Yorktown

I'm not against the tax (and I live in the burbs) but I think that if the MTA were better managed, less wasteful this would be better accepted. I would also suggest that if the cost is higher, maybe the fares need to bump up to cover more.

And Peter: there is a fee for bridges. $6.50 both ways yesterday to go into and out of the Bronx to visit IKEA. So that tax to shop in an store in the area was $13.

Aug. 27 2012 11:35 AM
Sheldon from Brooklyn

Suburbanites probably use the MTA (NYCTA, LIRR, Metro-North) more than people in the city do (who only use NYCTA). I'm scratching my head on how people in the suburbs are being treated unfairly.

Aug. 27 2012 11:15 AM
landless

I am playing devil's advocate here, but could this decision encourage businesses to be better distributed across the state? The New York City metropolitan area dominates the NY state economy. If transportation and housing costs are so high here, couldn't cities like Rochester, Syracuse and Buffalo benefit? More private businesses instead of reliance upon state employment would help Upstate and Western New York.

Aug. 27 2012 11:05 AM
Peter from Manhattan

Suburbanites don't want to subsidize the MTA? Fine. In exchange, I'd like to stop subsidizing suburban driving habits: Let's have tolls on all bridges into Manhattan, get rid of free on-street parking, and raise the gas tax to a level that's sufficient to pay for road construction and maintenance (bonus points for congestion pricing).

Aug. 27 2012 10:32 AM
mike from Inwood

Isn't this ruling a foretaste of what we can expect if Romney wins with majorities in the House and senate? The right wing is ideologically opposed to any collective action that can be avoided (Ayn Rand, etc.) unless the collective is a profit making body like a corporation. The Republican governors who have said no to high speed rail in their states know where their base is on this kind of issue.

Aug. 27 2012 10:07 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.