Meet the Candidates: Republicans for CT Senate

Monday, August 13, 2012

Connecticut Republican contenders for U.S. Senate Linda McMahonformer CEO of WWE, and Christopher Shaysformer Congressman (R CT 4th), talk about Tuesday's primary election to pick the candidates to replace Joe Lieberman.


Linda McMahon and Christopher Shays

Comments [14]

David from Fredericksburg, VA

@ Henry

Eliminating waste @ hospitals is like reducing the deficit by eliminating waste in government - a nice talking point.

Hospitals don't order tests - doctors do. Doctors are generally affiliated with, not employed by hospitals. Of course, there are exceptions to this, but generally they are not employees.

The draconian moves medicare is currently taking is only going to drive more providers to stop taking medicare patients. This is not what we want for medicare patients.

Saying all that, there is a problem & I don't know the answer - just that these answers (Obama's health care law & Ryan's plan) are not the right ones.

Aug. 13 2012 11:41 AM
henry from Rockville MD

Any candidate who first looks to cuts in benefits under Medicare without considering the waste in terms of capital outlays by hospitals and others as well as unnecessary tests, some of which may even be harmful to the patient, is joining the chorus of those barking up the wrong tree.

Aug. 13 2012 11:31 AM
David from Fredericksburg, VA

I'm sick of hearing how they're only going to hose those under 55.

I'm 50 - what magic can I perform to come up with the 100's of thousands of dollars I'll need to make up for the cuts to medicare & social security?

I'm also not getting warm fuzzies off of Democrats - they seem to want to just send us the way of Greece.

I think the first step is to let ALL of the Bush tax cuts expire - this will help a lot. Then we need to look at some reasonable cuts (not rape those without lobbyists).

Whoever gets elected, I figure I'm screwed.

Aug. 13 2012 11:27 AM
Hugh Sansom

Contrary to the lies of Republicans, Medicaid and Medicare are _very_ cost effective. Both are far more cost effective than any Fortune 500 company — by large margins. Moreover, both programs get excellent reviews from the people they serve. So why are Republicans so gung-ho about cutting two very effective government programs — because they oppose government except when it's sending kickbacks to the wealthy and spending billions on hugely inefficient military beasts.

Aug. 13 2012 11:26 AM
Jessie Henshaw from way downtown

Politics does seem to be an open invitation to complete babbling idiots...

Aug. 13 2012 11:26 AM
Hugh Sansom

Personal income taxes account for $8.7 billion of Connecticut's total revenue of $18.8 billion in 2012. If all of her tax cuts come from personal income taxes, then it _must_ be skewed to the wealthy, not the middle class. In that case, she's lying.

If by contrast, she's cutting taxes elsewhere, how can she say that she's delivering $500 per month to the "average middle class" taxpayer? Is she tallying up reductions in business taxes under the personal column?

However she's doing what she claims, she's lying.

Aug. 13 2012 11:23 AM
Hugh Sansom

Connecticut is seeing annual budget shortfalls in the neighborhood of $3 billion. McMahon says she will reduce revenues to the tune of _billions_. So she _must_ be planning cuts. Where? And why won't Brian Lehrer ask any tough questions?

Aug. 13 2012 11:16 AM

All she's doing is ducking Brian's questions and shmoozing with words like "let's move forward!" Meh.

Aug. 13 2012 11:16 AM

Does she like Coke or Pepsi?

Aug. 13 2012 11:15 AM

Will McMahon go after (jail) the crooks at AIG, which is based in Ct, or is she happy to accept their contributions?

Aug. 13 2012 11:14 AM

Cut the interview short because she has not answered a single question.
I will be deducting $100 for each minute she stays on the air.
Thank you.

Aug. 13 2012 11:13 AM
Lindsay from Harlem

She's totally incoherent! Hard to tell if she doesn't know how to answer the questions, or if she doesn't understand them. Maybe both?

Aug. 13 2012 11:11 AM
Hugh Sansom

McMahon has just lied both about the effects of the Affordable Care Act and about what can be done from a purely economic/revenue standpoint with tax reductions.

Aug. 13 2012 11:11 AM
Hugh Sansom

Why don't you ask Linda McMahon how she plans to get $500 per MONTH back to taxpayers when that would add up to $6000 per year — more than the average Connecticut taxpayer's yearly tax bill?

Aug. 13 2012 11:09 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.