Opinion: GOP Should Welcome the Spending Cuts They Bargained For

Friday, July 27, 2012 - 11:05 AM

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) hold a news conference after a meeting at the Republican National Committee offices July 26, 2011. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Speaker of the House John Boehner. (Win McNamee/Getty Images/Getty)

Republicans’ initial support for the sequestration cuts that are about to rein in Washington spending was a lapse in judgment bound to be a PR nightmare. But the party of fiscal discipline doesn't do itself any favors by running from these cuts now.

Rep. Buck McKeon, for instance, told Politico that he regrets backing the measures and other GOP lawmakers like Susan Collins have expressed their displeasure with the outcome too. Whatever the short-term consequences, Republicans have to stand their ground now. And if that helps to save the government from financial ruin, it might all have been worth it.

Republicans lobbied for the Budget Control Act, part of a last-minute negotiation to end last summer’s debt ceiling crisis, to include a sequestration mandate requiring $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts to defense and more over the next decade if Congress fails to agree on a plan for equal savings before January 2, 2013. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 15 percent of the cuts would come from entitlement spending, 43 percent from defense, and the other 42 percent from non-defense spending. But the prospect of 2 million lost jobs and 9 percent unemployment now have the GOP’s congressional leadership predicting catastrophe and blaming President Obama.

The GOP’s main complaint now is the extent to which the proposed cuts could affect the Pentagon, along with other defense-related jobs and manufacturing. Sequestration could divert $492 billion over the next decade from the Defense Department—10 percent of its budget. That doesn’t have to be a bad thing.

Hacker groups manage to function with a handful of people. But the DOD claims to need 140,000 to secure the Web alone. This could force it to economize a little. The cuts are also expected to force a 100,000-man reduction in troop size. That might be a good excuse to get out of Afghanistan and to close some of the useless US bases in Europe and elsewhere. And there’s no shame in that either: It’s restructuring, not retreating.

But here’s the craziest part: For all the hoopla about “catastrophic” cuts, the Number One drain on the federal budget—welfare spending—is almost exempt from sequestration. Under Obama, millions of people have been added to the food stamp rolls, Bill Clinton’s welfare-to-work requirements have been gutted, and the number of people claiming disability insurance has soared to 8.7 million—more than the whole population of New York City! But the projected $171 billion cut to entitlement spending amounts to just 0.6 percent of the $26 trillion that the government will be spending on welfare programs between now and 2021, according to the CBO. Yep. That’s zero percent. Leave it to Washington, huh?

It speaks ill of the GOP’s congressional leadership that it agreed to such a lopsided stab at austerity. But this is a chance for the Republicans to reclaim the mantle of fiscal discipline.

Democrats will make that as hard as possible. I predict no shortage of heartwarming commercials depicting this or that helpless person rising from the ashes of sorrow with the help of one federal government program or another. But a national debt of $16 trillion is insurmountable. Congress has been running trillion-dollar deficits since 2009. Something has to happen, and it has to happen now. The spending cuts have to start somewhere. If not now, when? If not this, what?


More in:

Comments [1]

Jack Jackson from Central New Jersey

Sorry, Dorian, you are part of the problem. I should have known by your first paragraph mislabeling of the GOP as "...the party of fiscal discipline..." when the actual record demonstrates that the GOP spend like drunken sailors when they are in control of the purse and the Executive. The national debt climbed from $5T to $11T under Bush II. And for what end? An unbalanced tax cut, two unpaid for wars and an unfunded expansion in entitlements are all indicia of the GOP idea of 'fiscal discipline'. Even the VP, Dick Cheney, was often quoted as saying 'Deficits don't matter'. Now, that the GOP is NOT in control of the executive, deficits DO matter. Funny thing is they always did.

Over 70% of the current budget shortfall is caused by the Bush Administration's destruction of the economy. The government's focus ought to be in repairing that. But the GOP won't let that happen...There's no election potential in it for them. Those are some Great Americans.

The priority should be 1) recover the JOBS lost through the Great Recession and 2) stop borrowing the money needed to run the government...Shrink Fed commitments AND tax more. But the fastest way to close the gap is to increase jobs first.

Jul. 29 2012 10:12 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by