Streams

Board of Elections Defends its Policies as 13th District Race Count Continues

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

A commissioner for the Board of Elections said at a meeting on Tuesday that there's still no winner in last week's primary race for the 13th Congressional district, where Charles Rangel’s lead against his nearest competitor has shrunk.

"There is no issue here about assigning a win to one candidate versus or another because we haven't certified the election," Commissioner Juan Carlos Polanco said.

The board still has a week to confirm the official tally, but that hasn't stopped State Senator Adriano Espaillat from challenging preliminary numbers that currently show an 802-point difference between him and incumbent Congressman Charlie Rangel.

After dropping their original petition on Monday, Espaillat's attorneys filed a new, broader request with the courts on Tuesday alleging voter suppression and intimidation on election day.

About 2,000 paper ballots still need to be counted, which includes absentee, military and affidavit votes. The board said that it would begin counting those votes on July 5.

Espaillat took the board to task on Monday morning for its counting process, as well as what the campaign alleged to be voter suppression due language barriers.

However, Polanco said that the board had yet to receive a formal complaint about translation failures at polling locations. Board attorney Steven H. Richman also told the commissioners that the only irregularly he had come across was the large request for absentee ballots in parts of northern Manhattan and Brooklyn.

The confusion in June's congressional primary has critics less than excited about the board's balloting plans for the September primaries and November general election.

"This is par for the course in New York," said Susan Lerner, executive director of good government advocates Common Cause New York. "This is an election where we only had a few primaries. Imagine how much worse this is going to be in September."

Tags:

More in:

Comments [1]

Katherine A. Doran

The request Mr. Richman referred to was for a large number of Affidavit ballots. Affidavit ballots are used by people who come out to vote, and for whatever reason, the
poll worker cannot find their name in the registration book. This is important because it suggests that people may have been confused by redistricting, and perhaps showed up at the wrong poll site. It also may suggest poorly trained poll workers who did not know how to find a voter's name, or failed to direct them to their correct poll site and ED.

Jul. 04 2012 05:12 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by