Mayor's Economic Group Admits It Broke Laws, Agrees to Reforms

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

The nonprofit that has spearheaded many of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's biggest economic development initiatives over the past decade conceded in a settlement Monday that it illegally lobbied the City Council for projects, and has pledged to restructure to avoid further violations.

The Economic Development Corporation (EDC) violated New York's Not-for-Profit Corporations Law by urging the City Council to make zoning changes in Willets Point, Queens in 2008, and Coney Island, Brooklyn, in 2009, a three-year investigation by the office of the New York Attorney General concluded.

The EDC and two smaller neighborhood groups, the Flushing-Willets Point-Corona Local Development Corporation and the Coney Island Development Corporation also "took steps to create the appearance of independent 'grassroots' support for the projects by concealing their participation in community organizing efforts," according to a statement from the office of Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

It is not clear how much money the three groups spent on lobbying.

Although it functions much like a city agency, the EDC is in fact a Type-C not-for-profit corporation, and is not a part of the government. The EDC's leaders are, however, appointed by the mayor. As a local development corporation, it is prohibited from all lobbying.

Under the terms of the settlement, the EDC will pay no penalty, but has agreed to restructure itself as two separate entities, one of which will continue to be called the EDC, with the other New York City Land Development Corporation ("NYCLDC").  

The EDC, as a not-for-profit, will be permitted to lobby on certain matters, including zoning changes.

The NYCLDC, which is classified as a local development corporation, will be authorized to receive property seized by the government, but cannot lobby under any circumstances.

A spokesman for the EDC said no staff has been let go as a result of the settlement.

The Bloomberg administration declined to comment.

“While these revelations of illegal lobbying are alarming, we cannot say that they come as a surprise," said City Comptroller John Liu, who has long been critical of the mayor's economic development policies.

Liu accused the EDC of creating "astroturf" groups to support its initiatives, while creating fewer jobs than promised.


More in:

Comments [3]

J Hipperman from Sherwood Gulch New Mexico

The highway built between Harpers Ridge and Sterlingfield was an unnessesary six lanes wide. It is rarely used.

That is a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Jul. 07 2012 11:33 PM
RJ from prospect hts.

I do wish that WNYC News would *stop* referring to this as a "revitalization" plan. That's the mayor's value judgment. To others it is a "destruction" plan. For the sake of accuracy, can't the News just say it's a plan to "dramatically change" these areas?

And p.s.: Much as I think it's extraordinary that Atty Gen Schneiderman investigated this, the lack of penalties, the notion that it was an "agency" that did this rather than the actual "people" who committed these individual criminal acts, is depressingly familiar.

Jul. 04 2012 11:45 AM
Jac Radoff from Manhattan

Sure would like to know how The Bloomberg Building, a towering monstrosity on East 58th Street, passed the city approval and zoning process? Since the mayor and his agencies did not obey the law in Coney Island, etc., should we assume that laws were followed where Mr Bloomberg's personal interests were directly envolved? We know that the mayor's personal wealth increased in the last ten years of his service as mayor from $5 billion to more than $22 billion, a nice return for a man who claims to receive only one dollar a year as compensation.

Jul. 04 2012 08:49 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


Latest Newscast




WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public


Supported by