Streams

Opinion: What's So Wrong With Corporate Gay-Washing?

Tuesday, June 19, 2012 - 01:00 PM

Gay rights activists are having a busy season. The president's "evolution" on marriage equality has injected gay rights squarely into the presidential election. The escalating court decisions promise a Supreme Court challenge to DOMA before long. And of course, there's the trip to Nike.

Nike just finished hosting a summit on sports, equality, homophobia and bullying at their headquarters in Oregon. There is a growing push for respect and equality in the traditionally macho world of sports. The You Can Play project has urged more athletes to speak out, and many professional teams recorded "It Gets Better" videos. But what's Nike's stake in the cause? Is Nike, not always associated with human rights, trying to be a good corporate citizen? Or is it just a smart business strategy?

It's terrific to see Nike involved in this issue, and it's no longer a business risk to stand up for LGBT rights and respect. All one has to do is see JC Penny's success in standing by Ellen Degeneres and the extreme popularity of their ads featuring same-sex parents, which have been shared and forwarded at a stunning pace on-line. That's right - regular people have been asking friends to watch a JC Penny ad. That's good business.

Is it good politics? When businesses appeal to our values to build customer loyalty, do they really help push forward our causes? Many businesses emphasize their environmental credentials, boast of labor practices and promote their investment in community and non-profit projects. But ultimately, the businesses are still businesses - they aren't making money in order to do good; they are doing good because it will help them make money.

There are some notable exceptions. CREDO Mobile is a progressive phone company, running a mobile network and long distance service in order to bring in a revenue stream to support liberal activism and invest in progressive non-profits. CREDO is one of Planned Parenthood's largest corporate donors, was instrumental in the fight against the Keystone pipeline, and is now targeting 10 anti-women, anti-science Tea Party members of Congress to take out in the coming election. I worked on a project for CREDO in 2006 and saw it first-hand; they were a cause disguised as a business.

Usually, the case is the opposite. In her newly-published book, "Ethical Chic," Brooklyn-based author Fran Hawthorne looks at six companies that have built reputations on their principled practices, and analyzes just how authentic their ethical claims are. Now that Tom's of Maine is owned by Colgate and is using plastic packaging, should its loyal customers consider alternatives?

Starbucks invests in its workers, but strongly opposes unions; and cares about sourcing its coffee beans, but not about reducing its own waste. When even Walmart and McDonald's seek to strengthen their green reputation, does that mean the movement is everywhere, or that the movement is meaningless?

It's valuable to have businesses taking up your cause, whether that means reducing their carbon footprint, promoting decent wages for the workers, or taking up LGBT rights. They have reach, resources and potential for impact that advocates envy.

But corporations aren't the leaders of a cause - it's not in their DNA. Nike, JC Penny and others can be good partners, but only after advocates have effectively started the cultural shift - whether you're working on behalf of woman's rights, immigrant rights, respect for diversity, public health or education. It may feel long a long haul, but when we lead, it's possible for big businesses to follow.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [4]

sadie from sad in brooklyn

honestly, these corporations (many not every single one) were behind the times on gay issues. they probably ran many polls and did their own research to see if it would be acceptable to get behind lgbt issues. I am fully aware their bottom line is the welfare of shareholders, so let's not kid our selves about these endorsements and this sport of uber/ultra-public sponsoring.

Go back in time to see what corporations made real, public honest strides for lgbt-ers and their employees. those corporations deserve a hats off for standing alone against a tide.

In 2012 I get a little disgusted that/when people applaud heterosexuals who support gay rights publicly, as though they're supporting some sort of revolutionary thinking. in 2012 to say you support full equal rights for lgbt-ers is saying you are a thinking, intelligent Constitution-understanding American. Should we really be applauding that, how sad.

Jun. 24 2012 12:32 PM
listener

Can the Democratic Party and the Obama campaign be included as a corporations that tell gullible "progressives" what they want to hear and raised dishonest pandering to an art form?

Jun. 19 2012 07:50 PM
Mark

Apple doesn't need to make ethical claims. They have a gay CEO, 'nuff said.

Jun. 19 2012 03:09 PM
William L. Fox from Wichita, Kansas

I have read the above paragraph and I can understand where you are coming from. I for one am a misplaced New York Liberal. I left New York for the State of Kansas situated right in the middle of the so called "BIBLE BELT" area. They have a church on just about every corner. Thanks to these facts Kansas voters have made a special amendment to their constitution forbidding marriage between couples of the same sex. They say marriage should be between a man & woman, like that is such a successful "GOD BLESSED" union. Why so many divorces IF God so ordained all of their marriage's. I think it is lust and for a few marriages it was Love that brought a man & woman together. God didn't have anything to do with it. Sorry I was on a roll.

Jun. 19 2012 02:55 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Authors

Feeds

Supported by