Opinion: Obama's on Shaky Ground With Crucial Constituencies

Monday, June 04, 2012 - 11:31 AM

President Barack Obama (Steve Jurvetson/flickr)

As Obama and Mitt Romney gird their loins and enter into full campaign battle mode, five constituencies become crucial to the outcome of the election: blacks, Hispanics, women, Independents, and young people.

Black voters

The African-American vote has been a mainstay of the Democratic Party. In 2008 they turned out in record numbers to elect the first black president in history. Now Obama is seeing a precipitous drop in the number of blacks with a “strongly favorable” view of the President, from 83 percent last year to 58 percent this year.

Still, 86 percent overall have a favorable view of Obama. He needs to reboot the enthusiasm of four years ago and work very hard with black leaders to generate another year of record turnout.

Mitt Romney has a hard row to hoe with these voters. In spite of affinities on issues such as gay marriage, the GOP has had a difficult time making inroads with this constituency.

Hispanic voters

Hispanics are the fastest growing minority in the United States, and have become the crucial difference between winning or losing in the 11 states where they play a significant electoral role.

In 2008 John McCain only received 31 percent of Hispanic voters to Obama’s 67 percent. Hispanic support for the Democratic nominee increased by 14 points overall compared with 2004, the biggest shift toward the Democrats by any voter group. In 2004, 53 percent voted For John Kerry, while 44 percent supported President George W. Bush — an all-time high for a GOP candidate for president and crucial to Bush's re-election.

Clearly Obama needs to try and repeat the magic of 2008. Mitt Romney has his job cut out for him, too. Although Hispanic voters are most passionate about jobs and the economy, the Republican hard line on immigration and deportation creates a very, very steep mountain for Romney and the Republicans to overcome.

The gender gap

We know that the Republicans have had a gender gap in every modern presidential election. In 2012 the issues of birth control, women’s health, the domestic violence bill in Congress, and the frequent harsh language of Rush Limbaugh and other Republican leaders have diminished the support of women for GOP candidates, including Romney. It does not help that the Mormon Church to which Romney belongs is not famous for its egalitarian views on the role of women.

Obama led Romney 52 to 41 percent among registered female voters surveyed, according to a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll (although the margin was 21 points in Obama's favor the previous month, indicating gains for Romney). That’s still a hurdle for Romney, who will need to convince women that his economic policies will be crucial to prosperity and strong families.

The youth

Young voters are always a challenge for presidential candidates because they tend not to vote in sufficient numbers. The astonishing results Obama had in 2008 with the youth vote were an aberration. It resulted from excitement and optimism about the candidate. Young voters are more progressive and more tolerant of racial diversity, gay rights, and abortion.

Obama skillfully used social media to excite, recruit, and mobilize the youth vote. Young voters went 2-1 for Obama and helped the Democrats sweep House seats as well. In 2012 young voters appear to have become discouraged by the economy and the fact that Obama did not implement some of his promises, especially to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Whether Romney can tap into the youth vote, say on the issue of the economy, is a stretch. Especially since Romney is viewed as totally not “cool” while Obama is once again emerging as “super cool.”


Independent or no-party voters are often crucial for presidential elections. Of course, Independents are also young, female and so on, so they are not a neat and unique group. In 2008 Obama won support from 52 percent of Independents to McCain’s 44 percent. This helped put Obama over the top in several states. Four years later, recent polling suggests Mitt Romney has been chipping away at Obama's hold on this group, with a surging favorability rating over the last month.

Given the dynamic of these constituencies, Obama has clear advantages with several groups — in particular women, blacks and young voters — but he needs to re-energize them for this election. Romney has a very tough job cut out for him with Hispanics and women, but seems to have a good shot at the coveted Independents. Romney also will gain faith-based, conservative, traditional and older voters. He has a clear advantage with men.

If Romney can stimulate intensity in these groups, he can win the election — especially if Obama’s constituencies are unmotivated.


More in:

Comments [2]

Dave Francis from Indianapolis, IN

By now most business are cognizant of the federal program E-Verify? It distinguishes US citizens and legal residents from illegal labor. Although not flawless, it has a 99.6 success rate and observably will overtime become even more constructive to business that believes in the "Rule of Law." Opponents in both the business sector and even on Capitol Hill have released a torrent of abuse against the application and both parties have refused to vote on this mandated law. That includes its function to reveal counterfeit documentation and spurious ID and reject foreign workers, so American can be hired. So even if you are flagged, and eligible to work, irregularities are resolved by GOING TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE TO BE EXONERATED? ONLY ILLEGAL LABOR WILL AVOID TURNING TO SSA FOR RESOLVING THIS ISSUE.

The open border conspirators may be defeated, when the federal Supreme Court a makes a major decision this month on Arizona policing laws. It could change the outlook of all 50 states, which are observing with great scrutiny if the central government says only there power is absolute. That Arizona cannot protect its own people from unfettered movement of illegal aliens, that they must keep paying for the thieves that are stealing our sovereignty and public entitlements But as E-Verify are perfected it needs to become a permanent tool in the incomplete arsenal of immigration enforcement. It needs to reach out to every company, big and small, in our country and every individual who works there? E-Verify eventually will expel foreign national from the workplace, without financial appropriations on a large scale. These people will self-deport when they cannot be hired anymore.

Businesses will be facing huge fines and prison as the ultimate deterrent. In time it will save our ailing schools, health care, home mortgages and government welfare system. Look to NUMBERSUSA for honest an answer, that includes costs to taxpayers for the new blanket AMNESTY. Which Senators and Republicans, which Governors, Mayors and other elected officials are anti-US American Worker and immigration upgrades? Illegal Immigration, the leaking border region, chain migration, sanctuary cities will certainly be an issue before we arrive at the presidential election. Sanctuary states as California, Nevada, and New York are overwhelmed by the need for more taxes, to pay for the overload of foreign nationals.

Jun. 05 2012 02:44 PM
Dave Francis from Indianapolis, IN

The usual open border entities are defying--THE AMERICAN PEOPLE--and are implicit in this weakening of our laws is Janet Napolitano, head of the Homeland Security, Eric Holder running the Department of Justice. Now we have Washington, D.C. Mayor-Vincent Gray denying the principles that govern us, signing a executive order similar to the directive in Los Angeles, that prohibits police officers from detaining foreign nationals even though even though it’s a mandated law, “SECURE COMMUNITIES”. All these so called politicians, the governors, Mayors and other elected political appendages of every level of government should be thrown in the street, when they are adverse to public’s will. For decades the government have repeatedly ignored, that mainstream demands was to build a secure barrier between the U.S and Mexico. There has been no real deterrent of overstays that disappear after leaving airports.

Anybody who has investigated the Democratic leadership would find they slowly weaken 287 G that gave regular police training to question suspicious people about their immigrant status? But oddly currently however the administration has mandated ‘Secure Communities’ which curbs illegal aliens who have been caught, and now subjected to fingerprinting and reviewed by Homeland Security and the ICE branch. Arizona County Sheriff Joe Ariapo was marked by radical groups as was his office; his deputies having a incredulous success until illegal immigration groups didn’t condone him apprehending not just alien criminal, but illegal aliens who have snubbed our laws in his jurisdiction.

We all must realize that BLANKET AMNESTY on the immediate horizon if Obama is returned in November to the white House. Liberals will pull out all the stops to collapse anything that smells of immigration enforcement, including the left’s politicians ignoring illegal aliens voting nationwide.

Jun. 05 2012 02:43 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by