Streams

Federal Appeals Court Overturns DOMA's Definition of Marriage

Thursday, May 31, 2012 - 02:34 PM

Same-sex couple Shelly Bailes (L) and Ellen Pontac celebrate the ruling to overturn the ban on gay marriage outside of the Philip Burton Federal building August 4, 2010 in San Francisco, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty)

In a unanimous ruling, a U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that a key component of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. This is the first time that DOMA was found to be unconstitutional by a Federal Appeals Court.

The First Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 3-0 decision, affirmed the U.S. District Court ruling in Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, saying that over the past 50 years, court precedents have called for the government to be scrutinized more closely when it comes to minority rights.

The case, brought in Massachusetts by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, said that it is discriminatory for same-sex couples legally married in that state not to have the same federal rights as legally married opposite-sex couples. Marriage is legal in two states in the First Circuit: Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

DOMA, signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996, has two parts: First, that no state is required to recognize legal gay marriages performed in other states.  And second, that the word “marriage” is defined to mean the legal union of one man and one woman for the United States government.

Before DOMA, the definition of marriage was generally left up to the states. The First Circuit said in its decision that “no precedent exists for DOMA’s sweeping general ‘federal’ definition of marriage for all federal statutes and programs.”

Yet DOMA’s impact has been far reaching – estimates say that DOMA affects around 100,000 legally wed gay couples. For example, gay Americans whose legal spouses are citizens of another country have seen their husbands and wives deported because the U.S. was unable to recognize their marriage for immigration purposes. Gay and lesbian members of the military, who are now able to openly serve, may not claim benefits for their spouses. A widowed gay spouse may not collect Social Security survivor benefits. And gay couples may not file joint federal tax returns, though they may file jointly on state tax returns in states where they are legally wed.

The First Circuit overturned DOMA’s definition of marriage, but said that the question of whether states which ban gay marriage must recognize legal same-sex marriages performed in other states is up to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Although President Barack Obama has declared that the Justice Department will no longer defend DOMA because it is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, it is expected that the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [1]

mk.hernandez

This is one more new step to equality. Question is whether prop 8 or DOMA gets to the Supreme court and will they see them together as one case, or two different cases or none at all?

--------------
Can you sign the petition I created, and pass it around to as many people as you can? Specifically can you post it on your facebook page?: http://www.change.org/petitions/u-s-food-and-drug-administration-allow-sexually-active-gay-men-to-donate-blood.

There is even a facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/groups/368546219869271/.

May. 31 2012 09:59 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at revsonfoundation.org.

Authors

Feeds

Supported by