Opinion: Why Rick Won't be Mitt's #2

Wednesday, April 04, 2012 - 02:45 PM

Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, waits to speak at the Lincoln-Reagan Day Dinner at Bowling Green State University during a campaign stop on March 3, 2012 in Bowling Rick Santorum waits to speak at the Lincoln-Reagan Day Dinner at Bowling Green State University. (Mario Tama/Getty)

Mitt Romney will be the GOP nominee. This has been the betting man's favorite for awhile. Karol Markowicz on the Right and I on the Left have agreed on this at It's A Free Country. Tuesday's wins cemented Mitt's momentum. The story is no longer whether Santorum will upset Romney but whether Rick can hold his own home state. The President and DNC are mobilizing against Romney. Short of a revolt by the Super Delegates, the numbers are on Mitt's side, and more GOP power brokers have been getting in line.

Obama vs. Romney, here we come. Just like we always knew we would. And Rick Santorum will be nowhere in site.

For all that Rick Santorum has shaped the race (even the fact that it's still going is remarkable), pushed the dialogue (who knew we'd be debating contraception?) and excited a small conservative base, he will not be running the next lap toward November at Romney's side. As much as he and Mitt both publicly suggest the possibility, it just won't happen -- which is good for Mitt…and, actually, good for Rick.

For Romney, the calculus is easy: Santorum gets him nothing. He's about to humiliate the ex-Senator in his homestate -- not a good trial run if the VP's job is to pull a swing-state like Pennsylvania. Obama is already standing firmly astride the center of American politics. Romney needs to shoulder him left, not flank him on the right, as Santorum would inevitably do. Romney is bleeding support among women because he has to match Santorum's anti-women rhetoric; in the general, the etch-a-sketch needs to make all those scars go away.

Then there's the most compelling factor: the more people know Santorum, the less they like him. That's already true of Romney. Whether that's inherent in these two men, or a factor of expensive and all-negative independent expenditure campaigns, the fact is that even in this long primary season of tight contests, turn-out has been considerably lower than four years ago. We think there is right-wing enthusiasm for Santorum, but that's only because there is nobody else being enthusiastic for any Republican. People are staying home.

Mitt can't have that in the general. He needs to choose a lesser known entity whose approval rating is higher, or at least whose disapproval rating is lower. It's why betting sites have Florida Senator Marco Rubio leading the pack, followed by New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez. He may want to watch that he doesn't get outshone by a more authentic-seeming media darling like Christie -- but he certainly has more to worry about than keeping a leash on a rival-turned-running-mate.

But Rick won't cry when he's passed over…because coming in #2 is better than running as the #2. Romney was the front-runner because he came in behind McCain; whose turn it was after he was bested by George W. Bush. The GOP primary system seems to respect "the next in line."

Whereas life isn't so kind to the general election also-rans. Dan Quayle, a former VP, was never a serious contender in '96 or 2000. Nobody heard of Jack Kemp again after '96. Sarah Palin is still in the spotlight -- but not in the running.

Santorum might get more out of a second place primary finish -- he gets to remain true to himself while running a 50 state campaign, groundwork for four years from now.

And Romney wins in the deal. After all, he gets to run without -- and run away from -- Rick Santorum.


More in:

Comments [4]

...and for my own opinion, Rick won't be #2 because he feels that Romney lied about the results of the Iowa Caucuses cutting off Rick's air to run a tighter race in New Hampshire. He has no respect for the man and what he is willing to do to win. This is about the only thing that I can agree with Rick Santorum on.

Apr. 04 2012 06:26 PM

@listener -

It is unconstitutional for the government to prevent my employer from restricting my health care options based on THEIR religion? Right.

And @leslie, can you enlighten us as to just HOW a documentary made in 2008 is BREAKING FREAKING NEWS??!!??

You trolls really need to find somewhere else to play.

Apr. 04 2012 06:23 PM

"who knew we'd be debating contraception?

President Obama knew when he began his latest unconstitutional assault against the First Amendment and the free exercise of religion which is exactly why he did it. He bet that his vacuous and easily distracted supporters would be more interested in condoms than the US Constitution and he was right. He certainly knows the intellectual caliber of those who vote for him.

Apr. 04 2012 05:32 PM
leslie johnson from minneapolis, mn

ForgeryGate now being verified by dozens of Hillary Clinton supporters

…Hillary Clinton supporters willing to come forward with evidence and affidavits documenting alleged criminal activity by the Obama campaign in the 2008 Democratic Party primary race.

Among their claims is that the CLINTONS WERE THE FIRST TO CHARGE OBAMA is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and that his birth certificate is a forgery.

Bettina Viviano, working with screenplay writer and director Gigi Gaston, produced in 2008 a documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced,” based on interviews from participants in Democratic Party primary caucuses. They accuse the Obama administration of illegitimate and illegal acts, including threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents and busing in voters in exchange for meals.

Apr. 04 2012 05:08 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


About It's A Free Blog

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a blog, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Supported by

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public.  Learn more at



Supported by