Streams

Air Force Debated Disposal of 9/11 Remains

Friday, March 30, 2012

Newly released Pentagon documents show that U.S. Air Force officers debated briefly about burial at sea before concluding that 1,321 unidentifiable fragments of remains from the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon should be treated as medical waste and incinerated.

A string of emails running from Aug. 5-7, 2002, reveal that an unnamed Air Force colonel suggested scattering the already-cremated remains at sea. A second official - a civilian - said it may be appropriate to also have witnesses and a chaplain present.

Their arguments that the 9/11 remains weren't just normal waste were rejected by others who concluded the material was medical waste and should not be treated like human remains.

The emails were among nearly 2,000 pages of documents released by the Pentagon Friday detailing operations at the mortuary at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, investigations into problems and mishandling of war dead and other remains there, and records about the disposal of body fragments.

The release came hours after senior Pentagon officials met with the families of some of the victims of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon to provide greater details about the incineration and dumping of small amounts of residual remains - potentially of their loved ones - in a landfill.

Last month's disclosure that incinerated 9/11 remains were sent to a landfill triggered outrage and demands for additional information about the practice, which was ended in June 2008. Since then the Air Force has put remnants in urns and disposed of them at sea from Navy or Coast Guard ships.

The emails, however, back up claims that there was a debate in the months after 9/11 over how best to treat small body fragments from the Pentagon rubble that could not be individually identified, and were often mixed with other material such as dirt and concrete.

In the string of emails titled "Group F bio waste," one colonel said, "I do like the idea of spreading the ashes at sea in that it is a neutral arena." And the colonel asks for written direction to set up the sea burial.

The response, from another unidentified official, said that Personnel Command at the military's Mortuary Affairs said that the contract says that no medical waste can be returned to the military services. And that, "powder and ashes from the incineration of the material and the containers that were used for the burning is to be disposed of as normal waste."

The email continued, "We should not be attempting to spread the residue as sea, as it could possible (sic) send a message to the next of kin that we are disposing human remains and that is not the case."

And the final conclusion was to immediately dispose of all the material.

A colonel acknowledged the decision, adding only that "my point, as you are aware of, is that Group F is not your normal set of medical waste."

The response, from a civilian, said "totally agree," and added that the decision was coordinated with higher headquarters' officials. The civilian added, "Understand Group F was special."

The final email suggested that some may have believed this was a decision that might be challenged later, as it warned other recipients to keep the email record "as proof of our coordination."

The documents released Friday lay out some of the different categories of remains from the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon. Group C was positively identified remains of 25 victims, which were eventually cremated and buried at Arlington Cemetery. Group D was mixed remains that were not individually identified but found to not be associated with any of the terrorists, and they were also targeted for release to Arlington.

Group E was remains of the terrorists, which were sent to the FBI. And Group F was 1,321 portions tagged by the FBI that were "non-associable" fragments that could not be further identified and were mixed with fragments of non-biological material.

The first revelations of the disposal came last month when the head of an independent panel, retired Gen. John Abizaid, released a report that assessed management problems at the at the Air Force mortuary at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware.

His work was triggered by disclosures last fall about the mishandling of remains of American war dead at Dover in 2010.

Gen. Norton Schwartz, the Air Force chief of staff, told reporters late last month that the actions taken by the Dover mortuary were based on written guidance issued in March 2002 by David Chu, who was the Pentagon personnel chief under Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Tags:

More in:

The Morning Brief

Enter your email address and we’ll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Comments [1]

julianpenrod from west caldwell, new jersey

Yet more evidence September 11 was a fraud. Would there have been any harm including the remains discussed in the article with the rest? But it raises the question, too, of, after a plane crashing into the building, how much would be recognizable. But the issue of terming the remains "medical waste" not only invokes the idea of wholesale deceit by the government, even to so-called "relatives" of the "victims", it calls into question whether any of the "remains" reported there or at the Twin Towers were real or planted there to maintain the fiction that people had been killed! Which brings up the question of whether any of the Pentagon staff aren't, in one way or another, "medical waste", doped up all the way with steroids, antibiotics, and psychosis inducing substances like Lariam.

Mar. 31 2012 12:44 AM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Sponsored

Latest Newscast

 

 

Support

WNYC is supported by the Charles H. Revson Foundation: Because a great city needs an informed and engaged public

Feeds

Supported by