Bloomberg's healthy Big Brother laws OK with New Yorkers

Thursday, October 20, 2011 - 10:41 AM

Sometimes--maybe even regularly--polls come in that have fascinating (baffling) results that make you either question the usefulness of polls or the cognitive faculties of mankind.

Today's case study: According to a Quinnipiac Poll released this morning, those polled showed New York voters are behind the mayor's war on fun attempts to make the city a healthier place to live.

  • 79 percent of voters polled said law requiring fast-food restaurants to post calorie information is “useful.”
  • 70 percent that the Bloomberg administration is “correct” to encourage restaurants to use less salt.
  • 50 percent supported a ban on Food Stamps for sugary sodas.
  • 85 say the smoking ban is good for people's health, and 52 support the ban on outdoor smoking in city parks and elsewhere.

OK, fine, part of this makes sense. People know what makes sense, health-wise, and they support concrete efforts to encourage healthy behavior. Shared social consequences for individual health problems and all that--valid argument.

But if voters support the government's involvement in the personal choices they make about their diet and tobacco use, then it's mind boggling to get to this next statistic: 49 percent say government shouldn’t get involved in people’s eating and drinking habits -- the plurality.

It might just be an issue of how much is too much, according to Maurice Carrroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

“New Yorkers are split on the question of ‘nanny government,’ the idea that City Hall might be intruding on their personal lives,” Carroll said. “But they like – a lot – a couple of the things that critics complain is ‘nanny’ government:  making restaurants post calorie counts and urging less use of salt. That ban on outdoor smoking?  A bare majority backs it.”


More in:

Comments [1]


I wonder to what extent these answers were affected by the classic desire of participants to give the "correct" answer and to what extent they reflect the mental and political change in "The New Yorker" and the change in New York.   The city that once thumbed its nose at Prohibition, that was a magnet for individualists,  that not just welcomed but cheered eccentricities, whose politics ran the gamut,   has been infantilized and neutered and homogenized into its own special kind of provincialism. 

Then, too, that New York that smoked and drank and ate what it wanted, was provably thinner and fitter than today's.  And what to make of THAT?

Oct. 21 2011 07:16 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.


"The Capitol Pressroom" with Susan Arbetter at 11 am

For show archives, please visit The Capitol Bureau's website here.

About The Empire

Everything you need to know about New York politics and governance. We aim for a ground-up approach to politics, reverse engineered to make the effect just as important as the players and the game they play. From the Long Island to The Thousand Islands, New York City Hall to the Capitol Building, The Empire's got you covered.

Check out WNYC's 2013 Mayor Tracker--the one-stop shop for info about the candidates, issues and trends in the upcoming New York City mayoral election.


Our Reporters


Supported by