Streams

New Yorkers continue to support OWS, consider Tea Party more influential

Tuesday, November 01, 2011 - 08:00 PM

Marist Poll put out a new survey today that adds a wrinkle to the Occupation movement. According to the poll, New York voters support Occupy Wall Street more than the Tea Party, 44 percent versus 21 percent. It should be noted that, inversely, a majority of voters don't support either, although 54 percent said OWS comes closer to their views. The poll also is underrepresented by Democrats, only representing 44 percent of those polled, while, statewide, the Dems have 49 percent of active registered voters.

All that aside, what's really interesting is that, while the Occupation continues to enjoy (relative) support, their strategy so far of not having an overt agenda leaves them with little influence in voters eyes. Nearly half--the plurality--felt the Tea Party will have more influence in the coming presidential elections than the Occupation.

“Not surprisingly, there is substantial support for the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York State as compared to the Tea Party movement,” Dr. Lee M. Miringoff, Director of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion, said in a statement. “However, when it comes to the potential political impact of the two groups for campaign '12, New Yorkers believe the Tea Party movement has the advantage.”

Maybe that's why Governor Andrew Cuomo can continue to oppose extending a surcharge on higher-income earners (despite his tense relationship with the Albany Occupation), even as voters continue to support by large majorities an extension of the measure. More than 60 percent of voters in the Marist poll said they, too, support a "millionaires' tax."

Tags:

More in:

Comments [2]

Larry Littlefield

Perhaps you should give more creedance to my reason -- because New York has the highest state and local tax burden in the country, by a mile.

http://www.r8ny.com/blog/larry_littlefield/taxes_data_from_the_census_of_governments.html

Ask yourself this question -- would those arguing most loudly for higher top tax rates still be in favor if these would be offset by lower taxes otherwise?

If our tax burden were lower, and we weren't getting ripped off on what we already pay, I'd be the first to call for more.  As it is, I'm only in favor of higher taxes at the federal level.

Nov. 02 2011 05:31 PM
Larry Littlefield

Perhaps you should give more creedance to my reason -- because New York has the highest state and local tax burden in the country, by a mile.

http://www.r8ny.com/blog/larry_littlefield/taxes_data_from_the_census_of_governments.html

Ask yourself this question -- would those arguing most loudly for higher top tax rates still be in favor if these would be offset by lower taxes otherwise?

If our tax burden were lower, and we weren't getting ripped off on what we already pay, I'd be the first to call for more.  As it is, I'm only in favor of higher taxes at the federal level.

Nov. 02 2011 05:31 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Get the WNYC Morning Brief in your inbox.
We'll send you our top 5 stories every day, plus breaking news and weather.

Sponsored

"The Capitol Pressroom" with Susan Arbetter at 11 am

For show archives, please visit The Capitol Bureau's website here.

About The Empire

Everything you need to know about New York politics and governance. We aim for a ground-up approach to politics, reverse engineered to make the effect just as important as the players and the game they play. From the Long Island to The Thousand Islands, New York City Hall to the Capitol Building, The Empire's got you covered.

Check out WNYC's 2013 Mayor Tracker--the one-stop shop for info about the candidates, issues and trends in the upcoming New York City mayoral election.

 

Our Reporters

Feeds

Supported by